2005SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Valuation of Metropolitan Quality of Life in Wages and Rents

Roxanne Ezzet-Lofstrom

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

This analysis uses intermetropolitan differences in quality of life to estimate the value that residents place on metropolitan amenities and disamenities in land and labor markets. Using individual-level data from the 1980 and 1990 Census of Population and Housing merged with metropolitan-level economic, social, and environmental factors, it estimates hedonic wage and rent equations to derive the value of amenities and disamenities for 257 metropolitan areas in the United States. Additionally, the extent to which capitalization of urban amenities and disamenities changes over time is examined. Results show that the valuation of the urban environment changes over time. Amenities appear to play a stronger role in the housing market compared to the labor market. Capitalization appears to adjust in a dynamic process resulting from disequilibrium in the marketplace and/or changes in consumer preferences.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This analysis uses intermetropolitan differences in quality of life to estimate the value that residents place on metropolitan amenities and disamenities in land and labor markets. Using individual-level data from the 1980 and 1990 Census of Population and Housing merged with metropolitan-level economic, social, and environmental factors, it estimates hedonic wage and rent equations to derive the value of amenities and disamenities for 257 metropolitan areas in the United States. Additionally, the extent to which capitalization of urban amenities and disamenities changes over time is examined. Results show that the valuation of the urban environment changes over time. Amenities appear to play a stronger role in the housing market compared to the labor market. Capitalization appears to adjust in a dynamic process resulting from disequilibrium in the marketplace and/or changes in consumer preferences.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This analysis uses intermetropolitan differences in quality of life to estimate the value that residents place on metropolitan amenities and disamenities in land and labor markets. Using individual-level data from the 1980 and 1990 Census of Population and Housing merged with metropolitan-level economic, social, and environmental factors, it estimates hedonic wage and rent equations to derive the value of amenities and disamenities for 257 metropolitan areas in the United States. Additionally, the extent to which capitalization of urban amenities and disamenities changes over time is examined. Results show that the valuation of the urban environment changes over time. Amenities appear to play a stronger role in the housing market compared to the labor market. Capitalization appears to adjust in a dynamic process resulting from disequilibrium in the marketplace and/or changes in consumer preferences.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Economic rent, Capitalization, Valuation (finance), Economics, Wage, Census, Labour economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Valuation of Metropolitan Quality of Life in Wages and Rents — Research Paper | ScholarLens