1979•Electr. Light Power (Boston); (United States)Requires access

Coal cleaning plus scrubbing proves economic desulfurization combination

R. M. Cole

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The combination of coal cleaning and flue-gas desulfurization can be a better choice than scrubbers alone. An analysis of sulfur and ash removal for three coal types, West Kentucky No. 9, 11, and 12, shows that precombustion cleaning reduces the capital investment and operating costs for the scrubber's absorbent handling and preparation system and for sludge disposal. Generally, the savings cover the cost of the coal preparation plant. If the EPA requires chemical fixation of scrubber sludge, the economics will tilt more in favor of the combination of precombustion cleaning and flue gas desulfurization. The greatest potential savings attributable to coal cleaning, however, are reduced maintenance costs and increased rated capacity. Precombustion cleaning would allow an increase in availability and capacity and reduced operating costs. Recently proposed EPA regulations preclude the use of coal cleaning alone as a method for complying with sulfur dioxide standards in new electric utility boilers. However, coal cleaning with scrubbers may be used in some cases as a cost-effective method of meeting the revised New Source Performance Standards.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The combination of coal cleaning and flue-gas desulfurization can be a better choice than scrubbers alone. An analysis of sulfur and ash removal for three coal types, West Kentucky No. 9, 11, and 12, shows that precombustion cleaning reduces the capital investment and operating costs for the scrubber's absorbent handling and preparation system and for sludge disposal. Generally, the savings cover the cost of the coal preparation plant. If the EPA requires chemical fixation of scrubber sludge, the economics will tilt more in favor of the combination of precombustion cleaning and flue gas desulfurization. The greatest potential savings attributable to coal cleaning, however, are reduced maintenance costs and increased rated capacity. Precombustion cleaning would allow an increase in availability and capacity and reduced operating costs. Recently proposed EPA regulations preclude the use of coal cleaning alone as a method for complying with sulfur dioxide standards in new electric utility boilers. However, coal cleaning with scrubbers may be used in some cases as a cost-effective method of meeting the revised New Source Performance Standards.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The combination of coal cleaning and flue-gas desulfurization can be a better choice than scrubbers alone. An analysis of sulfur and ash removal for three coal types, West Kentucky No. 9, 11, and 12, shows that precombustion cleaning reduces the capital investment and operating costs for the scrubber's absorbent handling and preparation system and for sludge disposal. Generally, the savings cover the cost of the coal preparation plant. If the EPA requires chemical fixation of scrubber sludge, the economics will tilt more in favor of the combination of precombustion cleaning and flue gas desulfurization. The greatest potential savings attributable to coal cleaning, however, are reduced maintenance costs and increased rated capacity. Precombustion cleaning would allow an increase in availability and capacity and reduced operating costs. Recently proposed EPA regulations preclude the use of coal cleaning alone as a method for complying with sulfur dioxide standards in new electric utility boilers. However, coal cleaning with scrubbers may be used in some cases as a cost-effective method of meeting the revised New Source Performance Standards.

Key concepts: Scrubber, Flue-gas desulfurization, Waste management, Data scrubbing, Coal, Environmental science, Flue gas, Sulfur dioxide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coal cleaning plus scrubbing proves economic desulfurization combination — Research Paper | ScholarLens