ScholarLens Back to search
2009•Journal watchRequires access

CT Angiography Is Clearly Better Than Conventional Angiography for Evaluating Extremity Trauma

John A. Marx, Faaem

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

These authors prospectively compared computed tomography angiography (CTA) and conventional angiography (CA) for evaluation of potential extremity

About this research paper

What this paper is about

These authors prospectively compared computed tomography angiography (CTA) and conventional angiography (CA) for evaluation of potential extremity

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

These authors prospectively compared computed tomography angiography (CTA) and conventional angiography (CA) for evaluation of potential extremity

Key concepts: Medicine, Angiography, Radiology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CT Angiography Is Clearly Better Than Conventional Angiography for Evaluating Extremity Trauma — Research Paper | ScholarLens