ScholarLens Back to search
2006•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Neglect of Duty is Fault Nonetheless: A Practical Discussion of Strict Liability

Prentice Lang White

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper chronicles my experiences with teaching a negligence law course for first-year law students. This Article includes references and detailed discussions of general negligence, products liability and, most of all, strict liability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper chronicles my experiences with teaching a negligence law course for first-year law students. This Article includes references and detailed discussions of general negligence, products liability and, most of all, strict liability.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper chronicles my experiences with teaching a negligence law course for first-year law students. This Article includes references and detailed discussions of general negligence, products liability and, most of all, strict liability.

Key concepts: Liability, Strict liability, Res ipsa loquitur, Contributory negligence, Neglect, Duty, Law, Tort

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Neglect of Duty is Fault Nonetheless: A Practical Discussion of Strict Liability — Research Paper | ScholarLens