2006Journal of Real Estate LiteratureRequires access

Rating Systems in New Zealand: An Empirical Investigation into Local Choice

William McCluskey, Arthur Grimes, Andrew Aitken, Suzi Kerr, Jason Timmins

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Local governments in New Zealand raise approximately 60% of revenue from property taxes to fund the delivery of local services. With local government given the legislative power to choose the basis of their property tax, this research provides empirical insight into variations between local governments and the property tax system employed. As several local authorities have opted over the last twenty years to change their rating system, the paper investigates if there are factors common to those authorities that could help explain these shifts. The research uncovers a pattern that relates the choice of rating system to the level of mean income within local authorities. Some tentative conclusions and implications are suggested both for New Zealand local public finance and for the use of property, and particularly land taxes more broadly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Local governments in New Zealand raise approximately 60% of revenue from property taxes to fund the delivery of local services. With local government given the legislative power to choose the basis of their property tax, this research provides empirical insight into variations between local governments and the property tax system employed. As several local authorities have opted over the last twenty years to change their rating system, the paper investigates if there are factors common to those authorities that could help explain these shifts. The research uncovers a pattern that relates the choice of rating system to the level of mean income within local authorities. Some tentative conclusions and implications are suggested both for New Zealand local public finance and for the use of property, and particularly land taxes more broadly.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Local governments in New Zealand raise approximately 60% of revenue from property taxes to fund the delivery of local services. With local government given the legislative power to choose the basis of their property tax, this research provides empirical insight into variations between local governments and the property tax system employed. As several local authorities have opted over the last twenty years to change their rating system, the paper investigates if there are factors common to those authorities that could help explain these shifts. The research uncovers a pattern that relates the choice of rating system to the level of mean income within local authorities. Some tentative conclusions and implications are suggested both for New Zealand local public finance and for the use of property, and particularly land taxes more broadly.

Key concepts: Property tax, Local government, Legislature, Local property, Public economics, Revenue, Economics, Empirical research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rating Systems in New Zealand: An Empirical Investigation into Local Choice — Research Paper | ScholarLens