1991Indian journal of plant protectionOpen access

Field Evaluadon of Fenarimol and Triadimefon for Control of Powdery Mildew (Erysiphe Polygoni Dc.) of Pea

D.P. Singh Rana, Preeti Bharadwaj, M.V.B. Rao, Dibyendu Chatterjee

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Field trials were conducted at the Central Plant Protection Training Institute farm for three years (1989–1991) for the control of powdery mildew of pea caused by Erysiphe polygoni DC. on the commonly grown cultivar Bonl1eviile. Carbenndazim (0.1%), dioncap (0.05%), fenarimol (0.045%) and (0.06%), triadimefon (0.025%) and (0.04%,) and wettable sulphur (0.3%) were tested along with an untreated control in.. a randomized block design. Two sprays of eithler triadimef on (0.04%) or fenarimol (0.06%) were very effective for disease contro as well as increasing the green pod yield. These were followed by dinocap and wettable sulphur which were intermediate and carbendazim was least effective. The cOot benefit ratio was in the order of wettable sulphur (1:12.5) >- triadimefon (0.025%) (1:12.4) >- dinocap (1:11.8)>-triadimefon (0.04%) (1:9.0) and carbendazim (1:2).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Field trials were conducted at the Central Plant Protection Training Institute farm for three years (1989–1991) for the control of powdery mildew of pea caused by Erysiphe polygoni DC. on the commonly grown cultivar Bonl1eviile. Carbenndazim (0.1%), dioncap (0.05%), fenarimol (0.045%) and (0.06%), triadimefon (0.025%) and (0.04%,) and wettable sulphur (0.3%) were tested along with an untreated control in.. a randomized block design. Two sprays of eithler triadimef on (0.04%) or fenarimol (0.06%) were very effective for disease contro as well as increasing the green pod yield. These were followed by dinocap and wettable sulphur which were intermediate and carbendazim was least effective. The cOot benefit ratio was in the order of wettable sulphur (1:12.5) >- triadimefon (0.025%) (1:12.4) >- dinocap (1:11.8)>-triadimefon (0.04%) (1:9.0) and carbendazim (1:2).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Field trials were conducted at the Central Plant Protection Training Institute farm for three years (1989–1991) for the control of powdery mildew of pea caused by Erysiphe polygoni DC. on the commonly grown cultivar Bonl1eviile. Carbenndazim (0.1%), dioncap (0.05%), fenarimol (0.045%) and (0.06%), triadimefon (0.025%) and (0.04%,) and wettable sulphur (0.3%) were tested along with an untreated control in.. a randomized block design. Two sprays of eithler triadimef on (0.04%) or fenarimol (0.06%) were very effective for disease contro as well as increasing the green pod yield. These were followed by dinocap and wettable sulphur which were intermediate and carbendazim was least effective. The cOot benefit ratio was in the order of wettable sulphur (1:12.5) >- triadimefon (0.025%) (1:12.4) >- dinocap (1:11.8)>-triadimefon (0.04%) (1:9.0) and carbendazim (1:2).

Key concepts: Powdery mildew, Triadimefon, Carbendazim, Fungicide, Randomized block design, Wettable powder, Horticulture, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field Evaluadon of Fenarimol and Triadimefon for Control of Powdery Mildew (Erysiphe Polygoni Dc.) of Pea — Research Paper | ScholarLens