2016International Journal of Metrology and Quality EngineeringOpen access

Cost comparisons of modifiedXchart for autocorrelated observations

D.R. Prajapati

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the economic design of modified X̅ chart for autocorrelated data and comparison with the economic design of Shewhart’s X̅ chart. An attempt has been made to counter autocorrelation by designing the modified X̅ chart; as the cost of operating a process control system is an important element in the economic design of control charts. The economic designs of both modified and Shewhart X̅ charts for autocorrelated observations are presented; using Lorenzen-Vance [1] cost model. The modified X̅ chart is based upon sum of chi-squares and has simplicity like Shewhart X̅ chart but more efficient than standard chart. Two sets of parameters suggested by Montgomery [2] are used to determine the optimal sampling intervals (h) and expected costs per hour. It shows that sampling interval (h) and expected cost/hour (C) depend upon various parameters of chart, used in this model. The expected costs/hour (C) for both the charts are computed for sample sizes of 2 and 4 at the various levels of correlation and process shifts in mean. It is concluded that at each level of correlation and shift in the process mean, the expected costs/hour of the modified X̅ chart are lower than the Shewhart chart.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents the economic design of modified X̅ chart for autocorrelated data and comparison with the economic design of Shewhart’s X̅ chart. An attempt has been made to counter autocorrelation by designing the modified X̅ chart; as the cost of operating a process control system is an important element in the economic design of control charts. The economic designs of both modified and Shewhart X̅ charts for autocorrelated observations are presented; using Lorenzen-Vance [1] cost model. The modified X̅ chart is based upon sum of chi-squares and has simplicity like Shewhart X̅ chart but more efficient than standard chart. Two sets of parameters suggested by Montgomery [2] are used to determine the optimal sampling intervals (h) and expected costs per hour. It shows that sampling interval (h) and expected cost/hour (C) depend upon various parameters of chart, used in this model. The expected costs/hour (C) for both the charts are computed for sample sizes of 2 and 4 at the various levels of correlation and process shifts in mean. It is concluded that at each level of correlation and shift in the process mean, the expected costs/hour of the modified X̅ chart are lower than the Shewhart chart.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents the economic design of modified X̅ chart for autocorrelated data and comparison with the economic design of Shewhart’s X̅ chart. An attempt has been made to counter autocorrelation by designing the modified X̅ chart; as the cost of operating a process control system is an important element in the economic design of control charts. The economic designs of both modified and Shewhart X̅ charts for autocorrelated observations are presented; using Lorenzen-Vance [1] cost model. The modified X̅ chart is based upon sum of chi-squares and has simplicity like Shewhart X̅ chart but more efficient than standard chart. Two sets of parameters suggested by Montgomery [2] are used to determine the optimal sampling intervals (h) and expected costs per hour. It shows that sampling interval (h) and expected cost/hour (C) depend upon various parameters of chart, used in this model. The expected costs/hour (C) for both the charts are computed for sample sizes of 2 and 4 at the various levels of correlation and process shifts in mean. It is concluded that at each level of correlation and shift in the process mean, the expected costs/hour of the modified X̅ chart are lower than the Shewhart chart.

Key concepts: X-bar chart, Autocorrelation, Chart, \bar x and R chart, Shewhart individuals control chart, Statistics, Control chart, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost comparisons of modifiedXchart for autocorrelated observations — Research Paper | ScholarLens