2004Unpublished venueRequires access

Continued detention for the protection of the community

Paul Shepanski, Thomas John, Parliamentary Library

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The legality of different forms of detention continues to be a prominent national issue. In August 2004, the High Court of Australia said the continued and potentially indefinite detention of failed asylum seekers who had asked to leave but had nowhere to go was constitutionally valid. A related issue is the constitutional validity of the continued detention for the protection of the community of prisoners who have completed their original sentence. Thomas John looks at the relevant legislation and court cases and their implications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The legality of different forms of detention continues to be a prominent national issue. In August 2004, the High Court of Australia said the continued and potentially indefinite detention of failed asylum seekers who had asked to leave but had nowhere to go was constitutionally valid. A related issue is the constitutional validity of the continued detention for the protection of the community of prisoners who have completed their original sentence. Thomas John looks at the relevant legislation and court cases and their implications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The legality of different forms of detention continues to be a prominent national issue. In August 2004, the High Court of Australia said the continued and potentially indefinite detention of failed asylum seekers who had asked to leave but had nowhere to go was constitutionally valid. A related issue is the constitutional validity of the continued detention for the protection of the community of prisoners who have completed their original sentence. Thomas John looks at the relevant legislation and court cases and their implications.

Key concepts: Principle of legality, Law, Political science, Preventive detention, Immigration detention, Legislation, High Court, Refugee

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Continued detention for the protection of the community — Research Paper | ScholarLens