Continued detention for the protection of the community
Paul Shepanski, Thomas John, Parliamentary Library
Abstract
Paul Shepanski, Thomas John, Parliamentary Library
Abstract
The legality of different forms of detention continues to be a prominent national issue. In August 2004, the High Court of Australia said the continued and potentially indefinite detention of failed asylum seekers who had asked to leave but had nowhere to go was constitutionally valid. A related issue is the constitutional validity of the continued detention for the protection of the community of prisoners who have completed their original sentence. Thomas John looks at the relevant legislation and court cases and their implications.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The legality of different forms of detention continues to be a prominent national issue. In August 2004, the High Court of Australia said the continued and potentially indefinite detention of failed asylum seekers who had asked to leave but had nowhere to go was constitutionally valid. A related issue is the constitutional validity of the continued detention for the protection of the community of prisoners who have completed their original sentence. Thomas John looks at the relevant legislation and court cases and their implications.
Key concepts: Principle of legality, Law, Political science, Preventive detention, Immigration detention, Legislation, High Court, Refugee