2013Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciencesRequires access

Evaluation of New Insecticides with Bioagent for the Management of Podborer Complex of Pigeonpea

Tavaragondi Vinayaka, S. Murali

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Evaluation of efficacy of new insecticides with bioagent revealed that the lowest pod damage by Helicoverpa was recorded in s pinosad → M. anisopliae → spinosad with 12.0%, podfly damage of 2.65% and field infestation of bruchid was 2.10% but lowest infestation of Maruca was in i ndoxacarb → M. anisopliae → indoxacarb with 0.78%. Total pod damage by podborers was the least in s pinosad → M. anisopliae → spinosad (17.62%) followed by indoxacarb →M. anisopliae →indoxacarb (22.58%) and flubendiamide→ M. anisopliae →flubendiamide (22.76%) which were at par but statistically different from other treatments. The total seed damage by podborer complex of pigeonpea also followed the trend of total pod damage. Lowest total seed damage was observed in case of spinosad→ M. anisopliae → spinosad with 16.98 per cent. Highest yield was recorded in case of spinosad → M. anisopliae→ spinosad with 13.20 q per. The lowest yield was observed in untreated control with 4.06 q ha −1 which was inferior to all other treatments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Evaluation of efficacy of new insecticides with bioagent revealed that the lowest pod damage by Helicoverpa was recorded in s pinosad → M. anisopliae → spinosad with 12.0%, podfly damage of 2.65% and field infestation of bruchid was 2.10% but lowest infestation of Maruca was in i ndoxacarb → M. anisopliae → indoxacarb with 0.78%. Total pod damage by podborers was the least in s pinosad → M. anisopliae → spinosad (17.62%) followed by indoxacarb →M. anisopliae →indoxacarb (22.58%) and flubendiamide→ M. anisopliae →flubendiamide (22.76%) which were at par but statistically different from other treatments. The total seed damage by podborer complex of pigeonpea also followed the trend of total pod damage. Lowest total seed damage was observed in case of spinosad→ M. anisopliae → spinosad with 16.98 per cent. Highest yield was recorded in case of spinosad → M. anisopliae→ spinosad with 13.20 q per. The lowest yield was observed in untreated control with 4.06 q ha −1 which was inferior to all other treatments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Evaluation of efficacy of new insecticides with bioagent revealed that the lowest pod damage by Helicoverpa was recorded in s pinosad → M. anisopliae → spinosad with 12.0%, podfly damage of 2.65% and field infestation of bruchid was 2.10% but lowest infestation of Maruca was in i ndoxacarb → M. anisopliae → indoxacarb with 0.78%. Total pod damage by podborers was the least in s pinosad → M. anisopliae → spinosad (17.62%) followed by indoxacarb →M. anisopliae →indoxacarb (22.58%) and flubendiamide→ M. anisopliae →flubendiamide (22.76%) which were at par but statistically different from other treatments. The total seed damage by podborer complex of pigeonpea also followed the trend of total pod damage. Lowest total seed damage was observed in case of spinosad→ M. anisopliae → spinosad with 16.98 per cent. Highest yield was recorded in case of spinosad → M. anisopliae→ spinosad with 13.20 q per. The lowest yield was observed in untreated control with 4.06 q ha −1 which was inferior to all other treatments.

Key concepts: Spinosad, Indoxacarb, Infestation, Toxicology, Point of delivery, Biology, Helicoverpa, Veterinary medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of New Insecticides with Bioagent for the Management of Podborer Complex of Pigeonpea — Research Paper | ScholarLens