2004KAUMS JournalRequires access

A COMPARISON OF ORAL CLINDAMYCIN AND ORAL METRONIDAZOLE IN TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL VAGINITIS

Zohre Mousavi, Reza Behrouzi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background : Bacterial vaginosis is one of the most common infection disorders affecting women. Several types of antibiotics have been used to treat this condition, although metronidazole was found to be the most effective one, none was completely successful in either cure or prevention. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral clindamycin and oral metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Material and methods : Sixty women aged 16 years or older in whom bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed by standard criteria such as Amsel’s and gram’s stain criteria were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind study to receive either oral clindamycin (300mg twice daily for 7 days) or oral metronidazole (500mg twice daily for 7 days). Women with coexisting vulvovaginal candidiasis or vaginal trichomoniasis were excluded. Tests were repeated at 7 th and 14 th day following the therapy. Vaginal symptoms, complications, and drug side effects were all recorded. Result : We have not found any statistically significant difference in cure rates for oral clindamycin (93.3%) and oral metronidazole (86.6%). Adverse reactions were mild in both groups. Four patients who have received clindamycin developed non-bloody diarrhea and 4 patients who were given metronidazole developed symptomatic candida vaginosis. Conclusion : Clindamycin may be a safe and effective alternative to metronidazole to treat women with bacterial vaginosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background : Bacterial vaginosis is one of the most common infection disorders affecting women. Several types of antibiotics have been used to treat this condition, although metronidazole was found to be the most effective one, none was completely successful in either cure or prevention. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral clindamycin and oral metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Material and methods : Sixty women aged 16 years or older in whom bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed by standard criteria such as Amsel’s and gram’s stain criteria were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind study to receive either oral clindamycin (300mg twice daily for 7 days) or oral metronidazole (500mg twice daily for 7 days). Women with coexisting vulvovaginal candidiasis or vaginal trichomoniasis were excluded. Tests were repeated at 7 th and 14 th day following the therapy. Vaginal symptoms, complications, and drug side effects were all recorded. Result : We have not found any statistically significant difference in cure rates for oral clindamycin (93.3%) and oral metronidazole (86.6%). Adverse reactions were mild in both groups. Four patients who have received clindamycin developed non-bloody diarrhea and 4 patients who were given metronidazole developed symptomatic candida vaginosis. Conclusion : Clindamycin may be a safe and effective alternative to metronidazole to treat women with bacterial vaginosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background : Bacterial vaginosis is one of the most common infection disorders affecting women. Several types of antibiotics have been used to treat this condition, although metronidazole was found to be the most effective one, none was completely successful in either cure or prevention. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral clindamycin and oral metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Material and methods : Sixty women aged 16 years or older in whom bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed by standard criteria such as Amsel’s and gram’s stain criteria were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind study to receive either oral clindamycin (300mg twice daily for 7 days) or oral metronidazole (500mg twice daily for 7 days). Women with coexisting vulvovaginal candidiasis or vaginal trichomoniasis were excluded. Tests were repeated at 7 th and 14 th day following the therapy. Vaginal symptoms, complications, and drug side effects were all recorded. Result : We have not found any statistically significant difference in cure rates for oral clindamycin (93.3%) and oral metronidazole (86.6%). Adverse reactions were mild in both groups. Four patients who have received clindamycin developed non-bloody diarrhea and 4 patients who were given metronidazole developed symptomatic candida vaginosis. Conclusion : Clindamycin may be a safe and effective alternative to metronidazole to treat women with bacterial vaginosis.

Key concepts: Metronidazole, Bacterial vaginosis, Clindamycin, Medicine, Vaginitis, Trichomoniasis, Internal medicine, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A COMPARISON OF ORAL CLINDAMYCIN AND ORAL METRONIDAZOLE IN TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL VAGINITIS — Research Paper | ScholarLens