1989Unpublished venueRequires access

Grip Strength in Different Elbow and Forearm Positions

Pei‐Fang Tang, Ying‐Tai Wu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test for differences in the grip strength among the six different combinations of elbow and forearm positions. The dominant hand of sixty normal subjects was tested for maximal grip strength in elbow flexion at 90 degrees with forearm in pronation, midposition, and supination and elbow at full extension with forearm in pronation, midposition, and supination. The six positions were randomized and the grip strength was measured by Jamar Dynamometer. Surface EMG of the biceps brachii of the dominant upper extremity was recorded simultaneously during grip testing. The result of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that elbow or forearm position could significantly change grip strength (p<0.001). There was also significant interaction between elbow and forearm position (p<0.05). Further post hoc test with Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison showed that grip strength in the position of elbow flexion at 90 degrees with forearm pronation was significantly lower than those in the same elbow position with other forearm position and those in the same forearm position with other elbow position. It appeared to be similar results if we analyzed the male and female data separately. Furthermore, the regression coefficient between grip strength and integrated EMG of biceps brachii in the six positions is only 0.37 at 0.001 significant level. It suggested that the reasons for differences of grip strength in different elbow-forearm positions might mainly be other biomechanical factors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to test for differences in the grip strength among the six different combinations of elbow and forearm positions. The dominant hand of sixty normal subjects was tested for maximal grip strength in elbow flexion at 90 degrees with forearm in pronation, midposition, and supination and elbow at full extension with forearm in pronation, midposition, and supination. The six positions were randomized and the grip strength was measured by Jamar Dynamometer. Surface EMG of the biceps brachii of the dominant upper extremity was recorded simultaneously during grip testing. The result of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that elbow or forearm position could significantly change grip strength (p<0.001). There was also significant interaction between elbow and forearm position (p<0.05). Further post hoc test with Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison showed that grip strength in the position of elbow flexion at 90 degrees with forearm pronation was significantly lower than those in the same elbow position with other forearm position and those in the same forearm position with other elbow position. It appeared to be similar results if we analyzed the male and female data separately. Furthermore, the regression coefficient between grip strength and integrated EMG of biceps brachii in the six positions is only 0.37 at 0.001 significant level. It suggested that the reasons for differences of grip strength in different elbow-forearm positions might mainly be other biomechanical factors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to test for differences in the grip strength among the six different combinations of elbow and forearm positions. The dominant hand of sixty normal subjects was tested for maximal grip strength in elbow flexion at 90 degrees with forearm in pronation, midposition, and supination and elbow at full extension with forearm in pronation, midposition, and supination. The six positions were randomized and the grip strength was measured by Jamar Dynamometer. Surface EMG of the biceps brachii of the dominant upper extremity was recorded simultaneously during grip testing. The result of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that elbow or forearm position could significantly change grip strength (p<0.001). There was also significant interaction between elbow and forearm position (p<0.05). Further post hoc test with Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison showed that grip strength in the position of elbow flexion at 90 degrees with forearm pronation was significantly lower than those in the same elbow position with other forearm position and those in the same forearm position with other elbow position. It appeared to be similar results if we analyzed the male and female data separately. Furthermore, the regression coefficient between grip strength and integrated EMG of biceps brachii in the six positions is only 0.37 at 0.001 significant level. It suggested that the reasons for differences of grip strength in different elbow-forearm positions might mainly be other biomechanical factors.

Key concepts: Forearm, Elbow, Biceps, Elbow flexion, Grip strength, Medicine, Orthodontics, Upper limb

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Grip Strength in Different Elbow and Forearm Positions — Research Paper | ScholarLens