2010OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Open access

Collaborative Orientalism: From Hollywood’s “Yellow Perils” to Zhang Yimou’s “Red Trilogy”

Xiaodong Liu

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Cultural hegemony is not a set of theories or academic disciplines confined within the scholarly circle or philosophical sphere; nor is it being created to make Europeans feel good or superior.It is, in fact, a very practical means to gain control over the Other politically, economically and culturally.In a way, it is a crucial complementary aid to the military and political powers of Europeans.But how can European powers maintain their cultural hegemony after all of the former colonies have gained their independence?By exploring Edward Said's theory of Orientalism as well as Robert Young's Postcolonialism, this thesis proposes that cultural hegemony with its cultural values has never ceased to be an integral part of European dominance, and it continues to exercise its power even after decolonization.Both Said and other post-colonial theorists emphasize that Orientalism or cultural hegemony is a discourse between the West and the Rest.It is therefore a two-way traffic: a collaboration, either consciously or unconsciously, of the recipients of cultural hegemony.The study of Orientalism should not only focus on how the West uses different measures to gain control over the Rest, but also should examine how the recipients react to cultural hegemony.The author of this thesis provides a comparative study of the practice of cultural hegemony through an analysis of films produced by directors from both the West and East, namely D. W. Griffith in the U.S. and Zhang Yimou from China aiming in order to explore why cultural hegemony not only lingers in the post-colonial era, but can also be discerned among those who were colonized.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cultural hegemony is not a set of theories or academic disciplines confined within the scholarly circle or philosophical sphere; nor is it being created to make Europeans feel good or superior.It is, in fact, a very practical means to gain control over the Other politically, economically and culturally.In a way, it is a crucial complementary aid to the military and political powers of Europeans.But how can European powers maintain their cultural hegemony after all of the former colonies have gained their independence?By exploring Edward Said's theory of Orientalism as well as Robert Young's Postcolonialism, this thesis proposes that cultural hegemony with its cultural values has never ceased to be an integral part of European dominance, and it continues to exercise its power even after decolonization.Both Said and other post-colonial theorists emphasize that Orientalism or cultural hegemony is a discourse between the West and the Rest.It is therefore a two-way traffic: a collaboration, either consciously or unconsciously, of the recipients of cultural hegemony.The study of Orientalism should not only focus on how the West uses different measures to gain control over the Rest, but also should examine how the recipients react to cultural hegemony.The author of this thesis provides a comparative study of the practice of cultural hegemony through an analysis of films produced by directors from both the West and East, namely D. W. Griffith in the U.S. and Zhang Yimou from China aiming in order to explore why cultural hegemony not only lingers in the post-colonial era, but can also be discerned among those who were colonized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cultural hegemony is not a set of theories or academic disciplines confined within the scholarly circle or philosophical sphere; nor is it being created to make Europeans feel good or superior.It is, in fact, a very practical means to gain control over the Other politically, economically and culturally.In a way, it is a crucial complementary aid to the military and political powers of Europeans.But how can European powers maintain their cultural hegemony after all of the former colonies have gained their independence?By exploring Edward Said's theory of Orientalism as well as Robert Young's Postcolonialism, this thesis proposes that cultural hegemony with its cultural values has never ceased to be an integral part of European dominance, and it continues to exercise its power even after decolonization.Both Said and other post-colonial theorists emphasize that Orientalism or cultural hegemony is a discourse between the West and the Rest.It is therefore a two-way traffic: a collaboration, either consciously or unconsciously, of the recipients of cultural hegemony.The study of Orientalism should not only focus on how the West uses different measures to gain control over the Rest, but also should examine how the recipients react to cultural hegemony.The author of this thesis provides a comparative study of the practice of cultural hegemony through an analysis of films produced by directors from both the West and East, namely D. W. Griffith in the U.S. and Zhang Yimou from China aiming in order to explore why cultural hegemony not only lingers in the post-colonial era, but can also be discerned among those who were colonized.

Key concepts: Hegemony, Orientalism, Postcolonialism (international relations), Cultural hegemony, Trilogy, Sociology, Power (physics), Decolonization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Collaborative Orientalism: From Hollywood’s “Yellow Perils” to Zhang Yimou’s “Red Trilogy” — Research Paper | ScholarLens