2010PubMedRequires access

On humanizing the expert witness: a proposed narrative approach to expert witness qualification.

Michael Lamport Commons, Thomas Gordon Gutheil, James T. Hilliard

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Before expert witnesses may testify in court, it is nec-essary that they be qualified to render an expert opin-ion. The qualification process has three steps: first, the expert’s training, education, experience, and other indices of qualification are elicited on direct examination by the retaining attorney. Second, a proffer is made to the court of the witness as an expert; the proffer may be challenged or argued in voir dire or other mechanism by the opposing side. Finally, the court either accepts or rejects the proffer, and the witness, if now qualified as an expert, is en-titled to give expert opinions to a reasonable medical certainty, if testifying in a medical context. Problems of bias or conflict of interest must be sorted out. Traditionally, the first step in the process involves

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Before expert witnesses may testify in court, it is nec-essary that they be qualified to render an expert opin-ion. The qualification process has three steps: first, the expert’s training, education, experience, and other indices of qualification are elicited on direct examination by the retaining attorney. Second, a proffer is made to the court of the witness as an expert; the proffer may be challenged or argued in voir dire or other mechanism by the opposing side. Finally, the court either accepts or rejects the proffer, and the witness, if now qualified as an expert, is en-titled to give expert opinions to a reasonable medical certainty, if testifying in a medical context. Problems of bias or conflict of interest must be sorted out. Traditionally, the first step in the process involves

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Before expert witnesses may testify in court, it is nec-essary that they be qualified to render an expert opin-ion. The qualification process has three steps: first, the expert’s training, education, experience, and other indices of qualification are elicited on direct examination by the retaining attorney. Second, a proffer is made to the court of the witness as an expert; the proffer may be challenged or argued in voir dire or other mechanism by the opposing side. Finally, the court either accepts or rejects the proffer, and the witness, if now qualified as an expert, is en-titled to give expert opinions to a reasonable medical certainty, if testifying in a medical context. Problems of bias or conflict of interest must be sorted out. Traditionally, the first step in the process involves

Key concepts: Expert witness, Expert opinion, Narrative, Witness, Cross-examination, Process (computing), Psychology, Forensic psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On humanizing the expert witness: a proposed narrative approach to expert witness qualification. — Research Paper | ScholarLens