What Determines Efficacy? The Roles of Codes and Guidance Materials in Occupational Safety and Health Regulation
Neil Gunningham, Liz Bluff
Abstract
Neil Gunningham, Liz Bluff
Abstract
Codes of practice and guidance material fulfil important roles, especially (but not exclusively) under the occupational safety and health regimes of countries that have adopted the ‘Robens model’ of legislation, such as Australia, New Zealand and the UK. In these countries, codes provide greater certainty about what constitutes compliance, while guidance material provides broader advice. Despite the centrality of these mechanisms to the success of occupational safety and health regulation, they have been subjected to very little empirical scrutiny. The principal aim of this paper is to review the key characteristics that determine the efficacy of occupational safety and health codes of practice and guidance materials and, in so doing, to fill some gaps in the knowledge base about them. The empirical component was drawn from interviews and questionnaires in Australia, Canada (in particular British Columbia), Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the UK.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Codes of practice and guidance material fulfil important roles, especially (but not exclusively) under the occupational safety and health regimes of countries that have adopted the ‘Robens model’ of legislation, such as Australia, New Zealand and the UK. In these countries, codes provide greater certainty about what constitutes compliance, while guidance material provides broader advice. Despite the centrality of these mechanisms to the success of occupational safety and health regulation, they have been subjected to very little empirical scrutiny. The principal aim of this paper is to review the key characteristics that determine the efficacy of occupational safety and health codes of practice and guidance materials and, in so doing, to fill some gaps in the knowledge base about them. The empirical component was drawn from interviews and questionnaires in Australia, Canada (in particular British Columbia), Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the UK.
Key concepts: Scrutiny, Occupational safety and health, Legislation, Empirical research, Centrality, Principal (computer security), Effective safety training, Public relations