1976Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

RAIL PLANNING: A STATE VIEWPOINT

Jack Kinstlinger

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purposes and objectives of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973; its planning requirements; and the planning efforts of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, other northeastern and midwestern states, and various federal agencies in response to that legislation are described. Also included are a description and criticism of the report of February 1, 1974, by the U.S. Department of Transportation in response to the rail reorganization act. Attention is focused on the 17-state Conference of States on Regional Rail Reorganization, its formation and purposes, and its adopted resolutions and positions on rail reorganization planning by the U.S. Railway Association. This paper concludes that federal rail planning is defective because it places undue emphasis on abandonment of excess trackage as the solution to the railroad problem and uses fully allocated system cost rather than avoidable costs for evaluation of branch- line viability. The paper points out that federal rail planning has given insufficient consideration to future potential of the rail mode in moving persons and goods and to energy, environmental, and social needs of communities for continued rail service. Attention is focused on the harmful effects on competition and efficieny that may arise if federal rail reorganization efforts lead to one large single reorganized entity serving the entire northeast-midwest region. /Author/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purposes and objectives of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973; its planning requirements; and the planning efforts of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, other northeastern and midwestern states, and various federal agencies in response to that legislation are described. Also included are a description and criticism of the report of February 1, 1974, by the U.S. Department of Transportation in response to the rail reorganization act. Attention is focused on the 17-state Conference of States on Regional Rail Reorganization, its formation and purposes, and its adopted resolutions and positions on rail reorganization planning by the U.S. Railway Association. This paper concludes that federal rail planning is defective because it places undue emphasis on abandonment of excess trackage as the solution to the railroad problem and uses fully allocated system cost rather than avoidable costs for evaluation of branch- line viability. The paper points out that federal rail planning has given insufficient consideration to future potential of the rail mode in moving persons and goods and to energy, environmental, and social needs of communities for continued rail service. Attention is focused on the harmful effects on competition and efficieny that may arise if federal rail reorganization efforts lead to one large single reorganized entity serving the entire northeast-midwest region. /Author/

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purposes and objectives of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973; its planning requirements; and the planning efforts of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, other northeastern and midwestern states, and various federal agencies in response to that legislation are described. Also included are a description and criticism of the report of February 1, 1974, by the U.S. Department of Transportation in response to the rail reorganization act. Attention is focused on the 17-state Conference of States on Regional Rail Reorganization, its formation and purposes, and its adopted resolutions and positions on rail reorganization planning by the U.S. Railway Association. This paper concludes that federal rail planning is defective because it places undue emphasis on abandonment of excess trackage as the solution to the railroad problem and uses fully allocated system cost rather than avoidable costs for evaluation of branch- line viability. The paper points out that federal rail planning has given insufficient consideration to future potential of the rail mode in moving persons and goods and to energy, environmental, and social needs of communities for continued rail service. Attention is focused on the harmful effects on competition and efficieny that may arise if federal rail reorganization efforts lead to one large single reorganized entity serving the entire northeast-midwest region. /Author/

Key concepts: Abandonment (legal), Legislation, Competition (biology), Transportation planning, Service (business), Transport engineering, Business, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RAIL PLANNING: A STATE VIEWPOINT — Research Paper | ScholarLens