2009Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications DatabaseRequires access

Multimodality, inclusive design and intuitive use

Anja Naumann, Ina Wechsung, Jörn Hurtienne

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

With users being able to choose a modality matching their preferences and needs, multimodality is in line with the “Design for all”principle. However, despite the potential advantages possible disadvantages are also reported: Multimodality requires more effort for combination and coordination of the modalities, and higher cognitive load may be the result. Thus, it is not clear if multimodality actually increases accessibility to information technology and if there are modalities that are more “inclusive” than others. Therefore the current study investigates if different user groups (older vs. younger users) benefit from new input modalities, such as touch, speed, and motion interaction, as well as their multimodal combination. It was shown that especially motion control does not correspond to older users’ needs. Moreover, older users did not use the possibility of a flexible, multimodal interaction. The paper concludes with a discussion of the determinants of intuitive use in the light of the modalities investigated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With users being able to choose a modality matching their preferences and needs, multimodality is in line with the “Design for all”principle. However, despite the potential advantages possible disadvantages are also reported: Multimodality requires more effort for combination and coordination of the modalities, and higher cognitive load may be the result. Thus, it is not clear if multimodality actually increases accessibility to information technology and if there are modalities that are more “inclusive” than others. Therefore the current study investigates if different user groups (older vs. younger users) benefit from new input modalities, such as touch, speed, and motion interaction, as well as their multimodal combination. It was shown that especially motion control does not correspond to older users’ needs. Moreover, older users did not use the possibility of a flexible, multimodal interaction. The paper concludes with a discussion of the determinants of intuitive use in the light of the modalities investigated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With users being able to choose a modality matching their preferences and needs, multimodality is in line with the “Design for all”principle. However, despite the potential advantages possible disadvantages are also reported: Multimodality requires more effort for combination and coordination of the modalities, and higher cognitive load may be the result. Thus, it is not clear if multimodality actually increases accessibility to information technology and if there are modalities that are more “inclusive” than others. Therefore the current study investigates if different user groups (older vs. younger users) benefit from new input modalities, such as touch, speed, and motion interaction, as well as their multimodal combination. It was shown that especially motion control does not correspond to older users’ needs. Moreover, older users did not use the possibility of a flexible, multimodal interaction. The paper concludes with a discussion of the determinants of intuitive use in the light of the modalities investigated.

Key concepts: Multimodality, Modalities, Modality (human–computer interaction), Human–computer interaction, Computer science, Motion (physics), Multimodal interaction, Matching (statistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multimodality, inclusive design and intuitive use — Research Paper | ScholarLens