1977Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

STATE AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION RAIL RELATIONS

R. J. Brooks

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an outline of state and federal roles in inter- and intrastate rail decisions. Regulating intrastate rates came under Interstate Commerce Commission jurisdiction in 1920, and as late as 1958 the federal role was being extended. The Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 reversed the role, giving jurisdiction over intrastate rate questions to the states, but with certain strict rules. Passenger service and standards of service adequacy fell largely to Washington under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964. Today, the Interstate Commerce Commission and Urban Mass Transportation Administration are calling for more state and local participation in the planning for survival and operation of passenger service. Line abandonments may also be avoided through state planning and state and federal subsidy under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents an outline of state and federal roles in inter- and intrastate rail decisions. Regulating intrastate rates came under Interstate Commerce Commission jurisdiction in 1920, and as late as 1958 the federal role was being extended. The Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 reversed the role, giving jurisdiction over intrastate rate questions to the states, but with certain strict rules. Passenger service and standards of service adequacy fell largely to Washington under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964. Today, the Interstate Commerce Commission and Urban Mass Transportation Administration are calling for more state and local participation in the planning for survival and operation of passenger service. Line abandonments may also be avoided through state planning and state and federal subsidy under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents an outline of state and federal roles in inter- and intrastate rail decisions. Regulating intrastate rates came under Interstate Commerce Commission jurisdiction in 1920, and as late as 1958 the federal role was being extended. The Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 reversed the role, giving jurisdiction over intrastate rate questions to the states, but with certain strict rules. Passenger service and standards of service adequacy fell largely to Washington under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964. Today, the Interstate Commerce Commission and Urban Mass Transportation Administration are calling for more state and local participation in the planning for survival and operation of passenger service. Line abandonments may also be avoided through state planning and state and federal subsidy under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act.

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Commission, Subsidy, State (computer science), Service (business), Deregulation, Business, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
STATE AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION RAIL RELATIONS — Research Paper | ScholarLens