Prices and the Winners Curse
Paul D. Klemperer, Jeremy I. Bulow
Abstract
Open-access reader
Paul D. Klemperer, Jeremy I. Bulow
Abstract
Open-access reader
We usually assume increases in supply, allocation by rationing, and exclusion of potential buyers will never raise prices. But all of these activities raise the expected price in an important set of cases when common-value assets are sold. Furthermore, when we make the assumptions needed to rule out these anomalies when buyers are symmetric, small asymmetries among the buyers necessarily cause the anomalies to reappear.
OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We usually assume increases in supply, allocation by rationing, and exclusion of potential buyers will never raise prices. But all of these activities raise the expected price in an important set of cases when common-value assets are sold. Furthermore, when we make the assumptions needed to rule out these anomalies when buyers are symmetric, small asymmetries among the buyers necessarily cause the anomalies to reappear.
Key concepts: Rationing, Economics, Microeconomics, Curse, Value (mathematics), Winner's curse, Set (abstract data type), Financial economics