1981Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

PARTNERSHIP IN FUNDING PUBLIC TRANSIT: SEATTLE METRO

Tracy E Duiker

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Seattle Metro transit system is financed by an interesting combination of partners that includes the transit rider, the service-area resident, and the state. Although the transit rider contributes via the fares paid, the contribution from the other two partners is made available to the transit system by way of taxes levied by the transit agency. Both taxes--the retail sales tax and the motor vehicle excise tax--are available on an ongoing basis without being subject to any state or local jurisdictional appropriation process. Yields from these taxes are driven by the local economy and are anticipated to rise at least with inflation. This combination of local revenues is available to support both the operating and the capital needs of the system. This partnership in transit funding has proved to have been a very successful means of improving transit over the last decade. The combination of funding sources has provided both sufficient resources and sufficient flexibility to enable Seattle Metro to build a better-than-promised transit system. The reasons advanced a decade ago for the involvement of all three partners have become even more compelling. For this reason the Transit 1990 plan of Seattle Metro challenges each partner to provide the increased resources necessary to enable the system to continue to respond to the demand for transit service. (Author)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Seattle Metro transit system is financed by an interesting combination of partners that includes the transit rider, the service-area resident, and the state. Although the transit rider contributes via the fares paid, the contribution from the other two partners is made available to the transit system by way of taxes levied by the transit agency. Both taxes--the retail sales tax and the motor vehicle excise tax--are available on an ongoing basis without being subject to any state or local jurisdictional appropriation process. Yields from these taxes are driven by the local economy and are anticipated to rise at least with inflation. This combination of local revenues is available to support both the operating and the capital needs of the system. This partnership in transit funding has proved to have been a very successful means of improving transit over the last decade. The combination of funding sources has provided both sufficient resources and sufficient flexibility to enable Seattle Metro to build a better-than-promised transit system. The reasons advanced a decade ago for the involvement of all three partners have become even more compelling. For this reason the Transit 1990 plan of Seattle Metro challenges each partner to provide the increased resources necessary to enable the system to continue to respond to the demand for transit service. (Author)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Seattle Metro transit system is financed by an interesting combination of partners that includes the transit rider, the service-area resident, and the state. Although the transit rider contributes via the fares paid, the contribution from the other two partners is made available to the transit system by way of taxes levied by the transit agency. Both taxes--the retail sales tax and the motor vehicle excise tax--are available on an ongoing basis without being subject to any state or local jurisdictional appropriation process. Yields from these taxes are driven by the local economy and are anticipated to rise at least with inflation. This combination of local revenues is available to support both the operating and the capital needs of the system. This partnership in transit funding has proved to have been a very successful means of improving transit over the last decade. The combination of funding sources has provided both sufficient resources and sufficient flexibility to enable Seattle Metro to build a better-than-promised transit system. The reasons advanced a decade ago for the involvement of all three partners have become even more compelling. For this reason the Transit 1990 plan of Seattle Metro challenges each partner to provide the increased resources necessary to enable the system to continue to respond to the demand for transit service. (Author)

Key concepts: Public transport, Transit (satellite), Business, General partnership, Revenue, Service (business), Finance, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PARTNERSHIP IN FUNDING PUBLIC TRANSIT: SEATTLE METRO — Research Paper | ScholarLens