1975Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

CORROSION TESTING OF BRIDGE DECKS

R F Stratfull, W. J. Jurkovich, D L Spellman

Open publisher page 50 citations

Abstract

When the corrosive half-cell potentials on a bridge deck exceed about 10 percent or when corrosion-caused delamination exceeds about 1 percent of the deck area, a chloride analysis generally would not be required because the chloride content is already too great. For the average depth of reinforcing steel, the quantity of chloride apparently needed to cause corrosion was statistically related to the maximum amount at the 95 percent confidence limits of 1.0 lb/ cu yd (0.59 kg/ cu m). The accuracy of chloride determinations was about equal whether the concrete was drilled or cored. Although the half-cell potential of -0.35 volts CSE is indicative of active corrosion, an equipotential contour map is the most reliable means for evaluating the corrosion activity of steel in concrete. After repair of concrete delaminations, the percentage of corrosive potentials decreased by about 50 percent. Repairing concrete delaminations does not prevent or necessarily control corrosion at other locations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When the corrosive half-cell potentials on a bridge deck exceed about 10 percent or when corrosion-caused delamination exceeds about 1 percent of the deck area, a chloride analysis generally would not be required because the chloride content is already too great. For the average depth of reinforcing steel, the quantity of chloride apparently needed to cause corrosion was statistically related to the maximum amount at the 95 percent confidence limits of 1.0 lb/ cu yd (0.59 kg/ cu m). The accuracy of chloride determinations was about equal whether the concrete was drilled or cored. Although the half-cell potential of -0.35 volts CSE is indicative of active corrosion, an equipotential contour map is the most reliable means for evaluating the corrosion activity of steel in concrete. After repair of concrete delaminations, the percentage of corrosive potentials decreased by about 50 percent. Repairing concrete delaminations does not prevent or necessarily control corrosion at other locations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When the corrosive half-cell potentials on a bridge deck exceed about 10 percent or when corrosion-caused delamination exceeds about 1 percent of the deck area, a chloride analysis generally would not be required because the chloride content is already too great. For the average depth of reinforcing steel, the quantity of chloride apparently needed to cause corrosion was statistically related to the maximum amount at the 95 percent confidence limits of 1.0 lb/ cu yd (0.59 kg/ cu m). The accuracy of chloride determinations was about equal whether the concrete was drilled or cored. Although the half-cell potential of -0.35 volts CSE is indicative of active corrosion, an equipotential contour map is the most reliable means for evaluating the corrosion activity of steel in concrete. After repair of concrete delaminations, the percentage of corrosive potentials decreased by about 50 percent. Repairing concrete delaminations does not prevent or necessarily control corrosion at other locations.

Key concepts: Corrosion, Chloride, Delamination (geology), Deck, Half-cell, Materials science, Bridge deck, Bridge (graph theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CORROSION TESTING OF BRIDGE DECKS — Research Paper | ScholarLens