2012Florence Research (University of Florence)Requires access

Evaluation of different strategies for the control of the European cherry fruit fly in Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy).

S. Caruso, E. Ladurner, M. Benuzzi, E. Tamagnini, A. Granchietti, Patrizia Sacchetti, Antonio De Cristofaro, Anna Di Palma, L. A. Escudero‐Colomar, C. Ioriatti, Fabio Molinari

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Different strategies for the control of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi L., (Diptera Tephritidae) were evaluated in field trials conducted in Northern Italy (Pavullo, Modena) in 2008-2009. Two organophosphate insecticides (dimethoate and phosmet), the Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC 74040-based bioinsecticide (Naturalis®) applied alone and after dimethoate in IPM and spinosad were compared. Organophosphate insecticides gave the highest efficacy in reducing fruit infestation. Though the efficacy showed by Naturalis was lower than that of the organophosphates, the bioinsecticide controlled cherry fruit fly up to acceptable infestation levels when the pest pressure was not high. Spinosad spray did not reduce fruit damage compared to the untreated control.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Different strategies for the control of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi L., (Diptera Tephritidae) were evaluated in field trials conducted in Northern Italy (Pavullo, Modena) in 2008-2009. Two organophosphate insecticides (dimethoate and phosmet), the Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC 74040-based bioinsecticide (Naturalis®) applied alone and after dimethoate in IPM and spinosad were compared. Organophosphate insecticides gave the highest efficacy in reducing fruit infestation. Though the efficacy showed by Naturalis was lower than that of the organophosphates, the bioinsecticide controlled cherry fruit fly up to acceptable infestation levels when the pest pressure was not high. Spinosad spray did not reduce fruit damage compared to the untreated control.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Different strategies for the control of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi L., (Diptera Tephritidae) were evaluated in field trials conducted in Northern Italy (Pavullo, Modena) in 2008-2009. Two organophosphate insecticides (dimethoate and phosmet), the Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC 74040-based bioinsecticide (Naturalis®) applied alone and after dimethoate in IPM and spinosad were compared. Organophosphate insecticides gave the highest efficacy in reducing fruit infestation. Though the efficacy showed by Naturalis was lower than that of the organophosphates, the bioinsecticide controlled cherry fruit fly up to acceptable infestation levels when the pest pressure was not high. Spinosad spray did not reduce fruit damage compared to the untreated control.

Key concepts: Northern italy, Geography, European union, Business, Economic policy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of different strategies for the control of the European cherry fruit fly in Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy). — Research Paper | ScholarLens