DISCUSSION OF RESOURCE PAPER-WORKSHOP 2: POLICY PLANNING
Robert Johnson
Abstract
Robert Johnson
Abstract
This discussion which covers such aspects as the definition of policy, the derivation of policy, the determinants of good or bad policy, and outlines a plan for solution of urban transportation problems, also presents a framework that might be applied to policies on statewide transportation planning. The basic policy of such planning will establish long-range systems and corridor development plans that are designed to: serve the states objectives for economic growth, energy conservation, land use, safety and preservation and enhancement of the environment; provide optimization of the service provided by all modes of transportation consistent with efficiency, cost effectiveness, environmental protection, and enhancement of the quality of life; and support national goals and objectives. A policy on systems planning is described in which all transportation agencies in the state shall: develop long-range transportation plans for a minimum period of 10 years; formulate such plans to show the target accomplishments toward which the current capital expenditures will be directed; estimate maintenance and operating expenditure for the period of the plans; show the relation of recommended expenditure provisions to projections of revenues in accordance with traditional sources and trends; describe and show values pertaining to the economic and environmental impacts of systems and systems configurations as related to environmental categories and situations that will be affected by the plan outlines; provide for continual development of plans with a minimum update of every 2 years; notify the agencies of changes in plans; and recommend priorities for development of the systems. The policy on corridor or route planning sets forth that, based on priorities developed in the systems plan, the transportation agencies shall: analyze costs, economic effects and environmental impacts of alternative service concepts within corridors to the degree necessary to establish a fully supportable corridor plan; compare concepts utilizing other corridors or no corridors; select and fully document corridor plans; consult with government and private agencies having responsibilities related to the impacts of corridor development; conduct meetings with local officials, interest groups and the public; and develop environmental impact statements.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This discussion which covers such aspects as the definition of policy, the derivation of policy, the determinants of good or bad policy, and outlines a plan for solution of urban transportation problems, also presents a framework that might be applied to policies on statewide transportation planning. The basic policy of such planning will establish long-range systems and corridor development plans that are designed to: serve the states objectives for economic growth, energy conservation, land use, safety and preservation and enhancement of the environment; provide optimization of the service provided by all modes of transportation consistent with efficiency, cost effectiveness, environmental protection, and enhancement of the quality of life; and support national goals and objectives. A policy on systems planning is described in which all transportation agencies in the state shall: develop long-range transportation plans for a minimum period of 10 years; formulate such plans to show the target accomplishments toward which the current capital expenditures will be directed; estimate maintenance and operating expenditure for the period of the plans; show the relation of recommended expenditure provisions to projections of revenues in accordance with traditional sources and trends; describe and show values pertaining to the economic and environmental impacts of systems and systems configurations as related to environmental categories and situations that will be affected by the plan outlines; provide for continual development of plans with a minimum update of every 2 years; notify the agencies of changes in plans; and recommend priorities for development of the systems. The policy on corridor or route planning sets forth that, based on priorities developed in the systems plan, the transportation agencies shall: analyze costs, economic effects and environmental impacts of alternative service concepts within corridors to the degree necessary to establish a fully supportable corridor plan; compare concepts utilizing other corridors or no corridors; select and fully document corridor plans; consult with government and private agencies having responsibilities related to the impacts of corridor development; conduct meetings with local officials, interest groups and the public; and develop environmental impact statements.
Key concepts: Transportation planning, Revenue, Plan (archaeology), Capital expenditure, Resource (disambiguation), Business, Service (business), Comprehensive planning