2011Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Requires access

How sustainable is route navigation?: a comparison between commercial route planners and the policy principles of Road categorization

Koen De Baets, Sven Vlassenroot, Dirk Lauwers, Georges Allaert, Philippe De Maeyer

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In-Vehicle route planning is used to support a driver’s route choice and to guide a driver to a destination. The suggested route takes less account of environmental aspects, which could lead to cut-through traffic. The Flanders Spatial Structure plan describes certain categories of roads for the optimization of the road network based on selectively prioritizing either accessibility or liveability. The aim of this paper is to examine to what extent route planners apply the principles of this (policy-made) road categorization while calculating a route. Three route planners were used to calculate routes. These routes were compared to a ‘desired’ route which follows the principles of the spatial structure plan. This paper will describe the in-depth analysis of this research. The results show that differences in road usage are apparent. These deviations are mostly found in the use of low and/or high categorized roads. Especially roads of the lowest category are frequently used by route planners to guide through-traffic without considering the lower function of these roads. For some of these suggested routes, the desired route is a feasible alternative.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In-Vehicle route planning is used to support a driver’s route choice and to guide a driver to a destination. The suggested route takes less account of environmental aspects, which could lead to cut-through traffic. The Flanders Spatial Structure plan describes certain categories of roads for the optimization of the road network based on selectively prioritizing either accessibility or liveability. The aim of this paper is to examine to what extent route planners apply the principles of this (policy-made) road categorization while calculating a route. Three route planners were used to calculate routes. These routes were compared to a ‘desired’ route which follows the principles of the spatial structure plan. This paper will describe the in-depth analysis of this research. The results show that differences in road usage are apparent. These deviations are mostly found in the use of low and/or high categorized roads. Especially roads of the lowest category are frequently used by route planners to guide through-traffic without considering the lower function of these roads. For some of these suggested routes, the desired route is a feasible alternative.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In-Vehicle route planning is used to support a driver’s route choice and to guide a driver to a destination. The suggested route takes less account of environmental aspects, which could lead to cut-through traffic. The Flanders Spatial Structure plan describes certain categories of roads for the optimization of the road network based on selectively prioritizing either accessibility or liveability. The aim of this paper is to examine to what extent route planners apply the principles of this (policy-made) road categorization while calculating a route. Three route planners were used to calculate routes. These routes were compared to a ‘desired’ route which follows the principles of the spatial structure plan. This paper will describe the in-depth analysis of this research. The results show that differences in road usage are apparent. These deviations are mostly found in the use of low and/or high categorized roads. Especially roads of the lowest category are frequently used by route planners to guide through-traffic without considering the lower function of these roads. For some of these suggested routes, the desired route is a feasible alternative.

Key concepts: Categorization, Plan (archaeology), Route planning, Transport engineering, Function (biology), Computer science, Operations research, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How sustainable is route navigation?: a comparison between commercial route planners and the policy principles of Road categorization — Research Paper | ScholarLens