Treatment of childhood peptic oesophagitis with famotidine or alginate-antacid.
Giuseppina Oderda, Domenico Dell'Olio, Marco Forni, Luis Fariña, K Tavassoli, Nicoletta Ansaldi
Abstract
Giuseppina Oderda, Domenico Dell'Olio, Marco Forni, Luis Fariña, K Tavassoli, Nicoletta Ansaldi
Abstract
Both antacids and H2 receptor antagonists have a potential role in treating peptic oesophagitis associated with acid reflux. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of famotidine and alginate-antacid in children with endoscopically documented peptic oesophagitis. We compared clinical, endoscopic and histological response to alginate-antacid (1 tablet to be chewed 30 min after each meal and at bed time) or famotidine (1 mg/kg before supper at 7 pm) in 49 children (mean age 9 years, 34 males). Twenty-four of them were randomly allocated to alginate-antacid treatment (group A), twenty-five to famotidine (group B). Both treatments were protracted for six months and endoscopy was then repeated. Symptoms disappeared in 43.4% and improved in 47.8% of children of group A and disappeared in 91.6% of those of group B (p less than .05). Mean time for symptom disappearance was 17 weeks for group A and 5 weeks for group B (p less than .01). After six months, at endoscopy oesophagitis was healed in 43.4% in group A and in 41.6% of group B, the difference between the two groups was not significant, however the improvement of endoscopic grades induced by famotidine was significantly better (p less than .05). Histology showed a healed peptic oesophagitis in 52.2% of the children in group A and in 70.8% of group B (p less than .001). No toxicity was observed with either treatment. We conclude that famotidine is superior to alginate-antacid in treating peptic oesophagitis associated with acid reflux, since it induces a better symptomatic response and a greater improvement of endoscopic lesions.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Both antacids and H2 receptor antagonists have a potential role in treating peptic oesophagitis associated with acid reflux. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of famotidine and alginate-antacid in children with endoscopically documented peptic oesophagitis. We compared clinical, endoscopic and histological response to alginate-antacid (1 tablet to be chewed 30 min after each meal and at bed time) or famotidine (1 mg/kg before supper at 7 pm) in 49 children (mean age 9 years, 34 males). Twenty-four of them were randomly allocated to alginate-antacid treatment (group A), twenty-five to famotidine (group B). Both treatments were protracted for six months and endoscopy was then repeated. Symptoms disappeared in 43.4% and improved in 47.8% of children of group A and disappeared in 91.6% of those of group B (p less than .05). Mean time for symptom disappearance was 17 weeks for group A and 5 weeks for group B (p less than .01). After six months, at endoscopy oesophagitis was healed in 43.4% in group A and in 41.6% of group B, the difference between the two groups was not significant, however the improvement of endoscopic grades induced by famotidine was significantly better (p less than .05). Histology showed a healed peptic oesophagitis in 52.2% of the children in group A and in 70.8% of group B (p less than .001). No toxicity was observed with either treatment. We conclude that famotidine is superior to alginate-antacid in treating peptic oesophagitis associated with acid reflux, since it induces a better symptomatic response and a greater improvement of endoscopic lesions.
Key concepts: Antacid, Famotidine, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Peptic, Internal medicine, Tolerability, Reflux