1992Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute)Open access

The benthic communities of the North Sea: a summary of the results of the North Sea benthos survey

C.H.R. Heip, D. J. Basford, Johan Craeymeersch, J.-M. Dewarumez, Peter De Wilde, Jürgen Dörjes, Gerard Duineveld, A. Eleftheriou, P.M.J. Herman, Rony Huys, Georg Irion, U. Niermann, Paul F. Kingston, A. Künitzer, Eike Rachor, H. Rumohr, Karline Soetaert, Thomas Soltwedel

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

The biota living near, on, or in the sea floor are collectively called the benthos. Distinction is made between plants (phytobenthos) and animals (zoobenthos), living within the sediment (infauna) or moving about on its surface (epifauna). The infauna is split into categories according to size: macrobenthos (animals larger than 1 mm), meiobenthos (animals between 50 µm and 1 mm), and microbenthos (protozoans, fungi, bacteria, smaller than 50 µm). Most frequently the three fractions are defined methodologically based on the mesh sizes of the sieves used to separate the specimens from the sediments (1 mm and 50 µm). The zoobenthos of the southern and central North Sea was sampled during the North Sea Benthos Survey executed in April-May 1986. Macro- and meiozoobenthos were sampled at 197 stations covering the ICES grid from 51°N to 58°N and from 2°30'W to 8°15'E (see Figure 1). At each of these stations preferably three box cores and one van Veen grab, but sometimes only Van Veen grabs, were taken. The complete list of replicates, dates, samples and stations has been reported to ICES (Anonymous, 1986) and is available from Dr C. Heip on request. Additional samples for epifauna were taken with a beam trawl or dredge. Before sampling, two intercalibration exercises had been performed. The first exercise aimed at intercomparison of the sampling gear and processing methods (sieving, washing, fixation, etc.). The results clearly showed that comparisons of macrofauna data are very difficult and that standardization of gear and processing, as well as taxonomic intercalibration, will be essential for future comparative studies. The second intercalibration exercise showed the necessity of a standardized method of estimating the ash-free dry weight of macrobenthic organisms. The results of both exercises have been presented to ICES (Heip el al. , 1985; Duineveld and Witte, 1987). Most of the stations were analysed for macrofauna bio- mass, density and species composition, for meiofauna density and copepod species composition, for epifauna composition, density and biomass, for sediment grain sizes, protein content, plant pigment content, organic matter and a series of heavy metals: Zn, Pb, Cd, Ni, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn and Fe.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The biota living near, on, or in the sea floor are collectively called the benthos. Distinction is made between plants (phytobenthos) and animals (zoobenthos), living within the sediment (infauna) or moving about on its surface (epifauna). The infauna is split into categories according to size: macrobenthos (animals larger than 1 mm), meiobenthos (animals between 50 µm and 1 mm), and microbenthos (protozoans, fungi, bacteria, smaller than 50 µm). Most frequently the three fractions are defined methodologically based on the mesh sizes of the sieves used to separate the specimens from the sediments (1 mm and 50 µm). The zoobenthos of the southern and central North Sea was sampled during the North Sea Benthos Survey executed in April-May 1986. Macro- and meiozoobenthos were sampled at 197 stations covering the ICES grid from 51°N to 58°N and from 2°30'W to 8°15'E (see Figure 1). At each of these stations preferably three box cores and one van Veen grab, but sometimes only Van Veen grabs, were taken. The complete list of replicates, dates, samples and stations has been reported to ICES (Anonymous, 1986) and is available from Dr C. Heip on request. Additional samples for epifauna were taken with a beam trawl or dredge. Before sampling, two intercalibration exercises had been performed. The first exercise aimed at intercomparison of the sampling gear and processing methods (sieving, washing, fixation, etc.). The results clearly showed that comparisons of macrofauna data are very difficult and that standardization of gear and processing, as well as taxonomic intercalibration, will be essential for future comparative studies. The second intercalibration exercise showed the necessity of a standardized method of estimating the ash-free dry weight of macrobenthic organisms. The results of both exercises have been presented to ICES (Heip el al. , 1985; Duineveld and Witte, 1987). Most of the stations were analysed for macrofauna bio- mass, density and species composition, for meiofauna density and copepod species composition, for epifauna composition, density and biomass, for sediment grain sizes, protein content, plant pigment content, organic matter and a series of heavy metals: Zn, Pb, Cd, Ni, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn and Fe.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The biota living near, on, or in the sea floor are collectively called the benthos. Distinction is made between plants (phytobenthos) and animals (zoobenthos), living within the sediment (infauna) or moving about on its surface (epifauna). The infauna is split into categories according to size: macrobenthos (animals larger than 1 mm), meiobenthos (animals between 50 µm and 1 mm), and microbenthos (protozoans, fungi, bacteria, smaller than 50 µm). Most frequently the three fractions are defined methodologically based on the mesh sizes of the sieves used to separate the specimens from the sediments (1 mm and 50 µm). The zoobenthos of the southern and central North Sea was sampled during the North Sea Benthos Survey executed in April-May 1986. Macro- and meiozoobenthos were sampled at 197 stations covering the ICES grid from 51°N to 58°N and from 2°30'W to 8°15'E (see Figure 1). At each of these stations preferably three box cores and one van Veen grab, but sometimes only Van Veen grabs, were taken. The complete list of replicates, dates, samples and stations has been reported to ICES (Anonymous, 1986) and is available from Dr C. Heip on request. Additional samples for epifauna were taken with a beam trawl or dredge. Before sampling, two intercalibration exercises had been performed. The first exercise aimed at intercomparison of the sampling gear and processing methods (sieving, washing, fixation, etc.). The results clearly showed that comparisons of macrofauna data are very difficult and that standardization of gear and processing, as well as taxonomic intercalibration, will be essential for future comparative studies. The second intercalibration exercise showed the necessity of a standardized method of estimating the ash-free dry weight of macrobenthic organisms. The results of both exercises have been presented to ICES (Heip el al. , 1985; Duineveld and Witte, 1987). Most of the stations were analysed for macrofauna bio- mass, density and species composition, for meiofauna density and copepod species composition, for epifauna composition, density and biomass, for sediment grain sizes, protein content, plant pigment content, organic matter and a series of heavy metals: Zn, Pb, Cd, Ni, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn and Fe.

Key concepts: Benthos, Benthic zone, Oceanography, Fishery, Geography, North sea, Environmental science, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The benthic communities of the North Sea: a summary of the results of the North Sea benthos survey — Research Paper | ScholarLens