1982Special report - Transportation Research Board, National Research CouncilRequires access

EVOLVING FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL RELATIONSHIPS: THE FUTURE OF URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. REMARKS BY KENNETH TORP

Kenneth Torp

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The key to good planning is the establishing of a good rapport among the participating agencies. Unnecessary red tape, detailed prescriptive regulations, and the imposition of undue emphasis on federal policies not directly related to transportation must be eliminated. Three fundamental questions facing planners are noted: What should be the scope of urban transportation planning; What should be the appropriate level of transportation planning; and What are the possible outcomes of a reduced federal role in transportation? There is a need for transportation plans that mesh with land use--with economic, environmental and then functional plans. Various transportation modes should be broadly and cooperatively planned, and include capital investment, operations, and transportation system management techniques that should be carried out in concert. Also, state and local officials should plan in concert with citizen input.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The key to good planning is the establishing of a good rapport among the participating agencies. Unnecessary red tape, detailed prescriptive regulations, and the imposition of undue emphasis on federal policies not directly related to transportation must be eliminated. Three fundamental questions facing planners are noted: What should be the scope of urban transportation planning; What should be the appropriate level of transportation planning; and What are the possible outcomes of a reduced federal role in transportation? There is a need for transportation plans that mesh with land use--with economic, environmental and then functional plans. Various transportation modes should be broadly and cooperatively planned, and include capital investment, operations, and transportation system management techniques that should be carried out in concert. Also, state and local officials should plan in concert with citizen input.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The key to good planning is the establishing of a good rapport among the participating agencies. Unnecessary red tape, detailed prescriptive regulations, and the imposition of undue emphasis on federal policies not directly related to transportation must be eliminated. Three fundamental questions facing planners are noted: What should be the scope of urban transportation planning; What should be the appropriate level of transportation planning; and What are the possible outcomes of a reduced federal role in transportation? There is a need for transportation plans that mesh with land use--with economic, environmental and then functional plans. Various transportation modes should be broadly and cooperatively planned, and include capital investment, operations, and transportation system management techniques that should be carried out in concert. Also, state and local officials should plan in concert with citizen input.

Key concepts: Transportation planning, Scope (computer science), Plan (archaeology), State (computer science), Business, Comprehensive planning, Environmental planning, Investment (military)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVOLVING FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL RELATIONSHIPS: THE FUTURE OF URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. REMARKS BY KENNETH TORP — Research Paper | ScholarLens