2007•Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and EngineeringRequires access

An Investigation on Linear Regression and Ordinary Kriging Methods for Estimating Spatial Distribution of Snow Depth at Samsami Basin

Sharifi Mohammad Reza, A M Akhound Ali, J Porhemat, Jahangard Mohammadi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Knowledge on spatial distribution of snow storage in catchments is important in snow hydrology because of its effect on yielding run-off. Therefore, intensive scale is necessary to measure snow depth for collecting observed data. But, difficulties are involved in measuring snow depth at fields. Therefore, methods based on observed data have been developed to predict snow depths for unobserved area. To apply these methods, care is needed because of their abilities to predict snow depth accurately. Therefore, these methods should be evaluated for studied sites to select more accurate method. In the current research, an area of 5.2 2 Km as part of a small basin (named Samsami) as one of the headwaters of Northern Karoun, is studied for unobserved snow depth points. To do this, Multiple Linear Regression and Ordinary Kriging methods were applied and evaluated to the studied site. To compare and evaluate these two methods snow depths from 258 points were measured then; 208 points of them were used as working points and the others (50 points) as reference points to develop these two models. Finally, predicted results from these two methods for the 50 reference points were compared with their observed data, respectively. Statistical analyses of data showed that 67% of variations in snow depth which were affected by Elevation, North-South aspect and Wind shelter index can be modeled by Linear Regression method at %95 meaningful levels. However, Slope parameter did not show significant result at above confidence limit. Results from application of Ordinary Kriging method for the same data as were used above, showed that 62% of variations in snow depth can be modeled. Comparison of ability of these two models (predicting 67% of variations in snow depth with 62%) shows a little advantage for the Linear Regression which is an advantage for this method over the Ordinary Kriging method. However, the Ordinary Kriging method has another advantage over the Linear Regression which is its ability to show variations in spatial distribution of predicted snow depth smoothly on a map.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Knowledge on spatial distribution of snow storage in catchments is important in snow hydrology because of its effect on yielding run-off. Therefore, intensive scale is necessary to measure snow depth for collecting observed data. But, difficulties are involved in measuring snow depth at fields. Therefore, methods based on observed data have been developed to predict snow depths for unobserved area. To apply these methods, care is needed because of their abilities to predict snow depth accurately. Therefore, these methods should be evaluated for studied sites to select more accurate method. In the current research, an area of 5.2 2 Km as part of a small basin (named Samsami) as one of the headwaters of Northern Karoun, is studied for unobserved snow depth points. To do this, Multiple Linear Regression and Ordinary Kriging methods were applied and evaluated to the studied site. To compare and evaluate these two methods snow depths from 258 points were measured then; 208 points of them were used as working points and the others (50 points) as reference points to develop these two models. Finally, predicted results from these two methods for the 50 reference points were compared with their observed data, respectively. Statistical analyses of data showed that 67% of variations in snow depth which were affected by Elevation, North-South aspect and Wind shelter index can be modeled by Linear Regression method at %95 meaningful levels. However, Slope parameter did not show significant result at above confidence limit. Results from application of Ordinary Kriging method for the same data as were used above, showed that 62% of variations in snow depth can be modeled. Comparison of ability of these two models (predicting 67% of variations in snow depth with 62%) shows a little advantage for the Linear Regression which is an advantage for this method over the Ordinary Kriging method. However, the Ordinary Kriging method has another advantage over the Linear Regression which is its ability to show variations in spatial distribution of predicted snow depth smoothly on a map.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Knowledge on spatial distribution of snow storage in catchments is important in snow hydrology because of its effect on yielding run-off. Therefore, intensive scale is necessary to measure snow depth for collecting observed data. But, difficulties are involved in measuring snow depth at fields. Therefore, methods based on observed data have been developed to predict snow depths for unobserved area. To apply these methods, care is needed because of their abilities to predict snow depth accurately. Therefore, these methods should be evaluated for studied sites to select more accurate method. In the current research, an area of 5.2 2 Km as part of a small basin (named Samsami) as one of the headwaters of Northern Karoun, is studied for unobserved snow depth points. To do this, Multiple Linear Regression and Ordinary Kriging methods were applied and evaluated to the studied site. To compare and evaluate these two methods snow depths from 258 points were measured then; 208 points of them were used as working points and the others (50 points) as reference points to develop these two models. Finally, predicted results from these two methods for the 50 reference points were compared with their observed data, respectively. Statistical analyses of data showed that 67% of variations in snow depth which were affected by Elevation, North-South aspect and Wind shelter index can be modeled by Linear Regression method at %95 meaningful levels. However, Slope parameter did not show significant result at above confidence limit. Results from application of Ordinary Kriging method for the same data as were used above, showed that 62% of variations in snow depth can be modeled. Comparison of ability of these two models (predicting 67% of variations in snow depth with 62%) shows a little advantage for the Linear Regression which is an advantage for this method over the Ordinary Kriging method. However, the Ordinary Kriging method has another advantage over the Linear Regression which is its ability to show variations in spatial distribution of predicted snow depth smoothly on a map.

Key concepts: Snow, Kriging, Linear regression, Watershed, Environmental science, Structural basin, Statistics, Scale (ratio)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Investigation on Linear Regression and Ordinary Kriging Methods for Estimating Spatial Distribution of Snow Depth at Samsami Basin — Research Paper | ScholarLens