Multilateralism or Bilateralism: Trade Policy of th e EU in the Age of Free Trade Agreements
Sevil Acar, Mahmut Tekçe
Abstract
Sevil Acar, Mahmut Tekçe
Abstract
Until 2006, trade policy of the European Union (EU) had mainly been focused on multilateralism embraced by the Doha Development Agenda (DDA). Meanwhile, the EU maintained an effective suspension on the openin g of bilateral or regional negotiations where their increasing number was cons idered a ‘spaghetti bowl’ that creates problems for the international trading syst em. However, the suspension of the DDA negotiations in July 2006 forced the EU to reveal a new trade policy with the motto of “rejection of protectionism at home, accom panied by activism in creating open markets and fair conditions for trade abroad” which focuses on the removal of tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade of goods and services. Consequently, the EU gave pace to signing FTAs with its significant trade partners. T his new trade strategy based on increasing FTAs and thus on bilateralism, which aim s at the highest possible degree of trade, investment, and services liberalization, tar gets regulatory convergence and the abolishment of non-tariff barriers beside stronger provisions on intellectual property rights and competition. This paper discusses whethe r the new trade strategy of the EU leads to a distraction of the EU’s trade policy foc us from multilateralism to bilateralism or it still remains committed to the WTO.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Until 2006, trade policy of the European Union (EU) had mainly been focused on multilateralism embraced by the Doha Development Agenda (DDA). Meanwhile, the EU maintained an effective suspension on the openin g of bilateral or regional negotiations where their increasing number was cons idered a ‘spaghetti bowl’ that creates problems for the international trading syst em. However, the suspension of the DDA negotiations in July 2006 forced the EU to reveal a new trade policy with the motto of “rejection of protectionism at home, accom panied by activism in creating open markets and fair conditions for trade abroad” which focuses on the removal of tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade of goods and services. Consequently, the EU gave pace to signing FTAs with its significant trade partners. T his new trade strategy based on increasing FTAs and thus on bilateralism, which aim s at the highest possible degree of trade, investment, and services liberalization, tar gets regulatory convergence and the abolishment of non-tariff barriers beside stronger provisions on intellectual property rights and competition. This paper discusses whethe r the new trade strategy of the EU leads to a distraction of the EU’s trade policy foc us from multilateralism to bilateralism or it still remains committed to the WTO.
Key concepts: Bilateralism, Multilateralism, International trade, Free trade, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Commercial policy, International economics, Protectionism