Exploring the Application of Institutional Theory to Tax Policy for Retirement Savings in New Zealand and Australia
Lisa Marriott, Kevin Holmes
Abstract
Lisa Marriott, Kevin Holmes
Abstract
Institutional theory is widely employed in disciplines ranging from history and sociology through to economics and political science. This article investigates the application of institutional theory to the topic of tax policy development. Authors such as Peters (1991), Steinmo (1993), Hale (2002) and Eccleston (2004) have successfully utilised institutional theory to explain the development of tax policy and differences in tax policy evolution across countries. This article adopts a case study perspective and investigates the potential for historical institutionalism to explain the different approaches adopted by New Zealand and Australia in their respective tax treatment of retirement savings. It is hypothesised that institutional theory will be challenged in explaining the different approaches adopted in two countries that are similar politically, economically and culturally and that face common social problems, in particular that of an ageing population.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Institutional theory is widely employed in disciplines ranging from history and sociology through to economics and political science. This article investigates the application of institutional theory to the topic of tax policy development. Authors such as Peters (1991), Steinmo (1993), Hale (2002) and Eccleston (2004) have successfully utilised institutional theory to explain the development of tax policy and differences in tax policy evolution across countries. This article adopts a case study perspective and investigates the potential for historical institutionalism to explain the different approaches adopted by New Zealand and Australia in their respective tax treatment of retirement savings. It is hypothesised that institutional theory will be challenged in explaining the different approaches adopted in two countries that are similar politically, economically and culturally and that face common social problems, in particular that of an ageing population.
Key concepts: Historical institutionalism, Institutional theory, Economics, Institutionalism, Public economics, Face (sociological concept), Perspective (graphical), Population ageing