Speculation and significance: Japan's scientific whaling before the International Court of Justice
Claire Brighton
Abstract
Claire Brighton
Abstract
On 31 May 2010 the Australian Ambassador to The Netherlands applied to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to institute proceedings against Japan in relation to Japan's JARPA II scientific whaling program. Australia alleged, inter alia, that the granting of special permits under JARPA II was in contravention of the prohibition of commercial whaling under the International Convention on the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
On 31 May 2010 the Australian Ambassador to The Netherlands applied to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to institute proceedings against Japan in relation to Japan's JARPA II scientific whaling program. Australia alleged, inter alia, that the granting of special permits under JARPA II was in contravention of the prohibition of commercial whaling under the International Convention on the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW).
Key concepts: Whaling, International court, Law, Political science, Economic Justice, International law, Convention, Public international law