2012•NRCT Data CenterOpen access

Comparative study of diagnostic accuracy between close needle biopsy and open incisional biopsy in musculoskeletal sarcoma

Phutsapong Srisawat

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we purpose to study the diagnostic accuracy and other diagnostic values (diagnostic yield, error, complication) of CNB without real-time image-guidance in out-patient clinic by comparing with open incisional biopsy in musculoskeletal sarcoma patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the biopsy cases of sarcoma patients since 2002-2011 from medical records and histopathology database. The diagnostic accuracy in 4 aspects of histopathology: nature (benign or malignant), specific diagnosis, histological type, and histological grade between 2 methods were compared statistically, the gold standard were the histopathology from resected specimens while definite surgery and information of clinicoradiographic/laboratory by clinical course. The other diagnostic values (diagnostic yield, error, complication) were also compared between both methods. Results: There were 200 cases (open incisional biopsy 105 cases and CNB 95 cases). The diagnostic accuracies of open incisional biopsy were 97.14% for nature, 89.52% for specific diagnosis, 89.52% for histological type, 88.57% for histological grade and the diagnostic accuracies of CNB were 96.84%, 89.47%, 88.42%, 86.32% respectively. There were no statistically significant different between 2 methods in all histological aspects (nature; P-value = 0.901 95%CI = -0.432 to 0.380, specific diagnosis; P-value = 0.991 95%CI = -0.227 to 0.224, histological type P- value = 0.803 95%CI = -0.250 to 0.193, and histological grade; P-value = 0.63 95%CI = -0.261 to 0.158). The diagnostic yields of both methods were 98.13% for open incisional biopsy, 97.94% for CNB. It was no statistically significant different also as shown in table 6 (P-value = 0.919 95%CI = -0.469 to 0.520). There were 6 cases (3%) for overall major errors, 3 cases (2.86%) for open incisional biopsy and 3 cases (3.16%) for CNB. There were 18 cases (9%) for minor errors, 9 cases (8.57%) for open incisional biopsy and 9 cases (9.47%) for CNB. There was no related biopsy complication in both methods. Conclusion: The office-based CNB for diagnosis musculoskeletal sarcoma can achieve the acceptable high diagnostic accuracy rates comparing with the open incisional biopsy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: In this study, we purpose to study the diagnostic accuracy and other diagnostic values (diagnostic yield, error, complication) of CNB without real-time image-guidance in out-patient clinic by comparing with open incisional biopsy in musculoskeletal sarcoma patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the biopsy cases of sarcoma patients since 2002-2011 from medical records and histopathology database. The diagnostic accuracy in 4 aspects of histopathology: nature (benign or malignant), specific diagnosis, histological type, and histological grade between 2 methods were compared statistically, the gold standard were the histopathology from resected specimens while definite surgery and information of clinicoradiographic/laboratory by clinical course. The other diagnostic values (diagnostic yield, error, complication) were also compared between both methods. Results: There were 200 cases (open incisional biopsy 105 cases and CNB 95 cases). The diagnostic accuracies of open incisional biopsy were 97.14% for nature, 89.52% for specific diagnosis, 89.52% for histological type, 88.57% for histological grade and the diagnostic accuracies of CNB were 96.84%, 89.47%, 88.42%, 86.32% respectively. There were no statistically significant different between 2 methods in all histological aspects (nature; P-value = 0.901 95%CI = -0.432 to 0.380, specific diagnosis; P-value = 0.991 95%CI = -0.227 to 0.224, histological type P- value = 0.803 95%CI = -0.250 to 0.193, and histological grade; P-value = 0.63 95%CI = -0.261 to 0.158). The diagnostic yields of both methods were 98.13% for open incisional biopsy, 97.94% for CNB. It was no statistically significant different also as shown in table 6 (P-value = 0.919 95%CI = -0.469 to 0.520). There were 6 cases (3%) for overall major errors, 3 cases (2.86%) for open incisional biopsy and 3 cases (3.16%) for CNB. There were 18 cases (9%) for minor errors, 9 cases (8.57%) for open incisional biopsy and 9 cases (9.47%) for CNB. There was no related biopsy complication in both methods. Conclusion: The office-based CNB for diagnosis musculoskeletal sarcoma can achieve the acceptable high diagnostic accuracy rates comparing with the open incisional biopsy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: In this study, we purpose to study the diagnostic accuracy and other diagnostic values (diagnostic yield, error, complication) of CNB without real-time image-guidance in out-patient clinic by comparing with open incisional biopsy in musculoskeletal sarcoma patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the biopsy cases of sarcoma patients since 2002-2011 from medical records and histopathology database. The diagnostic accuracy in 4 aspects of histopathology: nature (benign or malignant), specific diagnosis, histological type, and histological grade between 2 methods were compared statistically, the gold standard were the histopathology from resected specimens while definite surgery and information of clinicoradiographic/laboratory by clinical course. The other diagnostic values (diagnostic yield, error, complication) were also compared between both methods. Results: There were 200 cases (open incisional biopsy 105 cases and CNB 95 cases). The diagnostic accuracies of open incisional biopsy were 97.14% for nature, 89.52% for specific diagnosis, 89.52% for histological type, 88.57% for histological grade and the diagnostic accuracies of CNB were 96.84%, 89.47%, 88.42%, 86.32% respectively. There were no statistically significant different between 2 methods in all histological aspects (nature; P-value = 0.901 95%CI = -0.432 to 0.380, specific diagnosis; P-value = 0.991 95%CI = -0.227 to 0.224, histological type P- value = 0.803 95%CI = -0.250 to 0.193, and histological grade; P-value = 0.63 95%CI = -0.261 to 0.158). The diagnostic yields of both methods were 98.13% for open incisional biopsy, 97.94% for CNB. It was no statistically significant different also as shown in table 6 (P-value = 0.919 95%CI = -0.469 to 0.520). There were 6 cases (3%) for overall major errors, 3 cases (2.86%) for open incisional biopsy and 3 cases (3.16%) for CNB. There were 18 cases (9%) for minor errors, 9 cases (8.57%) for open incisional biopsy and 9 cases (9.47%) for CNB. There was no related biopsy complication in both methods. Conclusion: The office-based CNB for diagnosis musculoskeletal sarcoma can achieve the acceptable high diagnostic accuracy rates comparing with the open incisional biopsy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Incisional biopsy, Biopsy, Sarcoma, Radiology, Open biopsy, Surgery, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of diagnostic accuracy between close needle biopsy and open incisional biopsy in musculoskeletal sarcoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens