2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Amphibious Assault in the 21st Century: Are the Costs and Risks Too High?

Andrew M. Turner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : The rise in cost of developing and maintaining an amphibious force in readiness and the risk associated with amphibious operations, in terms of lives, ships, and equipment that could potentially be lost, have raised concerns specifically over the utility of conducting amphibious assaults in the 21st century. Furthermore, the proliferation and development of sea denial weapon systems combined with a reduced naval capability to counter anti-access, area-denial threats have forced military leaders to reconsider the use of amphibious assaults to achieve operational objectives. The following paper will analyze the primary threats of anti-ship missiles and naval mines, identify shortfalls with respect to the U.S. Navy's ability to conduct naval fire support and mine countermeasure operations, and offer a counterargument and rebuttal that will address the concept of Sea Power 21 as an enabler for the future implementation of amphibious assaults. Finally, conclusions regarding the future of amphibious operations and recommendations towards making amphibious assaults a viable option will be addressed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : The rise in cost of developing and maintaining an amphibious force in readiness and the risk associated with amphibious operations, in terms of lives, ships, and equipment that could potentially be lost, have raised concerns specifically over the utility of conducting amphibious assaults in the 21st century. Furthermore, the proliferation and development of sea denial weapon systems combined with a reduced naval capability to counter anti-access, area-denial threats have forced military leaders to reconsider the use of amphibious assaults to achieve operational objectives. The following paper will analyze the primary threats of anti-ship missiles and naval mines, identify shortfalls with respect to the U.S. Navy's ability to conduct naval fire support and mine countermeasure operations, and offer a counterargument and rebuttal that will address the concept of Sea Power 21 as an enabler for the future implementation of amphibious assaults. Finally, conclusions regarding the future of amphibious operations and recommendations towards making amphibious assaults a viable option will be addressed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : The rise in cost of developing and maintaining an amphibious force in readiness and the risk associated with amphibious operations, in terms of lives, ships, and equipment that could potentially be lost, have raised concerns specifically over the utility of conducting amphibious assaults in the 21st century. Furthermore, the proliferation and development of sea denial weapon systems combined with a reduced naval capability to counter anti-access, area-denial threats have forced military leaders to reconsider the use of amphibious assaults to achieve operational objectives. The following paper will analyze the primary threats of anti-ship missiles and naval mines, identify shortfalls with respect to the U.S. Navy's ability to conduct naval fire support and mine countermeasure operations, and offer a counterargument and rebuttal that will address the concept of Sea Power 21 as an enabler for the future implementation of amphibious assaults. Finally, conclusions regarding the future of amphibious operations and recommendations towards making amphibious assaults a viable option will be addressed.

Key concepts: Navy, Engineering, Denial, Aeronautics, Naval warfare, Computer security, Rebuttal, Risk analysis (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Amphibious Assault in the 21st Century: Are the Costs and Risks Too High? — Research Paper | ScholarLens