1983Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

BEHAVIOR OF ABUTMENT PILES IN AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT IN RESPONSE TO BRIDGE MOVEMENTS

James L. Jorgenson

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

A field study of the behavior of abutment piles for a bridge that has integral abutments, piers, concrete box girders, concrete deck, and six 75-ft spans is discussed. To compensate for anticipated thermal movements, two unique features were built into the bridge. Expansion joint material was placed between the back side of the abutment and the soil backfill, and compressible material was placed on the webs of the abutment piles to create low soil resistance to pile movement. Over a one-year period, monthly readings were taken of bridge length (by using steel tape), gap between soil backfill and back side of abutment, openings in the expansion joints on the concrete approach slabs, vertical elevation of abutments and piers, slope indicator readings on the four corner abutment piles, and temperatures of concrete deck and air. A formula involving air temperatures was developed to estimate the maximum change in bridge length due to thermal changes. The changes in bridge length agree with changes measured from steel tape and expansion joint openings. The study concluded that these changes did not result in equal abutment movements at each end of the bridge, and the maximum abutment movement resulted in stresses at the top of the piles sufficient to initiate a yield stress in the steel but not sufficient to form a plastic hinge. An analytic model was used to predict stresses in the abutment piles due to movements of the abutments. (Author)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A field study of the behavior of abutment piles for a bridge that has integral abutments, piers, concrete box girders, concrete deck, and six 75-ft spans is discussed. To compensate for anticipated thermal movements, two unique features were built into the bridge. Expansion joint material was placed between the back side of the abutment and the soil backfill, and compressible material was placed on the webs of the abutment piles to create low soil resistance to pile movement. Over a one-year period, monthly readings were taken of bridge length (by using steel tape), gap between soil backfill and back side of abutment, openings in the expansion joints on the concrete approach slabs, vertical elevation of abutments and piers, slope indicator readings on the four corner abutment piles, and temperatures of concrete deck and air. A formula involving air temperatures was developed to estimate the maximum change in bridge length due to thermal changes. The changes in bridge length agree with changes measured from steel tape and expansion joint openings. The study concluded that these changes did not result in equal abutment movements at each end of the bridge, and the maximum abutment movement resulted in stresses at the top of the piles sufficient to initiate a yield stress in the steel but not sufficient to form a plastic hinge. An analytic model was used to predict stresses in the abutment piles due to movements of the abutments. (Author)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A field study of the behavior of abutment piles for a bridge that has integral abutments, piers, concrete box girders, concrete deck, and six 75-ft spans is discussed. To compensate for anticipated thermal movements, two unique features were built into the bridge. Expansion joint material was placed between the back side of the abutment and the soil backfill, and compressible material was placed on the webs of the abutment piles to create low soil resistance to pile movement. Over a one-year period, monthly readings were taken of bridge length (by using steel tape), gap between soil backfill and back side of abutment, openings in the expansion joints on the concrete approach slabs, vertical elevation of abutments and piers, slope indicator readings on the four corner abutment piles, and temperatures of concrete deck and air. A formula involving air temperatures was developed to estimate the maximum change in bridge length due to thermal changes. The changes in bridge length agree with changes measured from steel tape and expansion joint openings. The study concluded that these changes did not result in equal abutment movements at each end of the bridge, and the maximum abutment movement resulted in stresses at the top of the piles sufficient to initiate a yield stress in the steel but not sufficient to form a plastic hinge. An analytic model was used to predict stresses in the abutment piles due to movements of the abutments. (Author)

Key concepts: Abutment, Geotechnical engineering, Expansion joint, Structural engineering, Engineering, Bridge (graph theory), Pile, Deck

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
BEHAVIOR OF ABUTMENT PILES IN AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT IN RESPONSE TO BRIDGE MOVEMENTS — Research Paper | ScholarLens