1987Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF JOINTED CONCRETE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION WITHOUT RESURFACING

David L Lippert

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The results of a research project that was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of concrete pavement restoration (CPR) on jointed portland cement concrete pavement are described. The CPR methods evaluated were pavement grinding, grout undersealing, installing underdrains, retrofitting double-vee load transfer devices, and pavement patching. Five construction sections, located on Interstates in Illinois, were selected for evaluation. The original pavement sections were constructed between 1960 and 1963, then rehabilitated in 1983 and 1984. All pavements were of the same design: a 10-in. slab over a 6-in. granular base and a joint spacing of 100 ft. The evaluation began just before rehabilitation of each section and continued until May 1986. Evaluation was done using crack surveys, destructive testing, and nondestructive testing. Performance factors monitored were faulting, pavement cracking, pavement roughness, skid resistance, deflection, load transfer, void development, and drainage. A great deal of emphasis was placed on grout undersealing and doweled patching in laboratory and field experiments. Effectiveness of undersealing was determined by deflection testing using a Dynatest 8002 falling weight deflectometer and a Road Rater 2008. Another field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dowel bar size and number of dowels on full-depth patch performance. Several different techniques for dowel bar grouting were tested in the laboratory to establish grouting procedures. The findings of this research resulted in improvements in full-depth patch design, improved construction procedures, and proper use of undersealing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The results of a research project that was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of concrete pavement restoration (CPR) on jointed portland cement concrete pavement are described. The CPR methods evaluated were pavement grinding, grout undersealing, installing underdrains, retrofitting double-vee load transfer devices, and pavement patching. Five construction sections, located on Interstates in Illinois, were selected for evaluation. The original pavement sections were constructed between 1960 and 1963, then rehabilitated in 1983 and 1984. All pavements were of the same design: a 10-in. slab over a 6-in. granular base and a joint spacing of 100 ft. The evaluation began just before rehabilitation of each section and continued until May 1986. Evaluation was done using crack surveys, destructive testing, and nondestructive testing. Performance factors monitored were faulting, pavement cracking, pavement roughness, skid resistance, deflection, load transfer, void development, and drainage. A great deal of emphasis was placed on grout undersealing and doweled patching in laboratory and field experiments. Effectiveness of undersealing was determined by deflection testing using a Dynatest 8002 falling weight deflectometer and a Road Rater 2008. Another field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dowel bar size and number of dowels on full-depth patch performance. Several different techniques for dowel bar grouting were tested in the laboratory to establish grouting procedures. The findings of this research resulted in improvements in full-depth patch design, improved construction procedures, and proper use of undersealing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The results of a research project that was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of concrete pavement restoration (CPR) on jointed portland cement concrete pavement are described. The CPR methods evaluated were pavement grinding, grout undersealing, installing underdrains, retrofitting double-vee load transfer devices, and pavement patching. Five construction sections, located on Interstates in Illinois, were selected for evaluation. The original pavement sections were constructed between 1960 and 1963, then rehabilitated in 1983 and 1984. All pavements were of the same design: a 10-in. slab over a 6-in. granular base and a joint spacing of 100 ft. The evaluation began just before rehabilitation of each section and continued until May 1986. Evaluation was done using crack surveys, destructive testing, and nondestructive testing. Performance factors monitored were faulting, pavement cracking, pavement roughness, skid resistance, deflection, load transfer, void development, and drainage. A great deal of emphasis was placed on grout undersealing and doweled patching in laboratory and field experiments. Effectiveness of undersealing was determined by deflection testing using a Dynatest 8002 falling weight deflectometer and a Road Rater 2008. Another field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dowel bar size and number of dowels on full-depth patch performance. Several different techniques for dowel bar grouting were tested in the laboratory to establish grouting procedures. The findings of this research resulted in improvements in full-depth patch design, improved construction procedures, and proper use of undersealing.

Key concepts: Falling weight deflectometer, Dowel, Grout, Retrofitting, Deflection (physics), Driver rehabilitation, Engineering, Geotechnical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF JOINTED CONCRETE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION WITHOUT RESURFACING — Research Paper | ScholarLens