1985•OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Coal-cleaning options for SO/sub 2/ emission reduction

JAMES D. KILGROE, Johannes M. Strauss

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The article discusses coal-cleaning options for reducing SO/sub 2/ emissions. Conventional PCC can reduce the potential SO/sub 2/ emission from high-sulfur coal by 20-50%, depending on the inherent properties of individual coals. SO/sub 2/ emission reduction by conventional PCC is limited by the amount of finely distributed mineral sulfur (pyrite) and organic sulfur in coal. Advanced fine-coal-cleaning technologies can be used to remove fine pyrite and sometimes organic sulfur. Coal cleaning may be used in combination with other technologies to reduce SO/sub 2/ emission. Combinations such as coal cleaning and limestone injection multistage burners (LIMB) or flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) may be more cost effective than FGD alone. The use of a multi-stream coal-preparation plant to produce deep-cleaned and middling products is another control option. The deep-cleaned coal, which is low in ash and sulfur, can be burned without further SO/sub 2/ emission control while the middling product can be burned in a boiler with a LIMB or FGD system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article discusses coal-cleaning options for reducing SO/sub 2/ emissions. Conventional PCC can reduce the potential SO/sub 2/ emission from high-sulfur coal by 20-50%, depending on the inherent properties of individual coals. SO/sub 2/ emission reduction by conventional PCC is limited by the amount of finely distributed mineral sulfur (pyrite) and organic sulfur in coal. Advanced fine-coal-cleaning technologies can be used to remove fine pyrite and sometimes organic sulfur. Coal cleaning may be used in combination with other technologies to reduce SO/sub 2/ emission. Combinations such as coal cleaning and limestone injection multistage burners (LIMB) or flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) may be more cost effective than FGD alone. The use of a multi-stream coal-preparation plant to produce deep-cleaned and middling products is another control option. The deep-cleaned coal, which is low in ash and sulfur, can be burned without further SO/sub 2/ emission control while the middling product can be burned in a boiler with a LIMB or FGD system.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article discusses coal-cleaning options for reducing SO/sub 2/ emissions. Conventional PCC can reduce the potential SO/sub 2/ emission from high-sulfur coal by 20-50%, depending on the inherent properties of individual coals. SO/sub 2/ emission reduction by conventional PCC is limited by the amount of finely distributed mineral sulfur (pyrite) and organic sulfur in coal. Advanced fine-coal-cleaning technologies can be used to remove fine pyrite and sometimes organic sulfur. Coal cleaning may be used in combination with other technologies to reduce SO/sub 2/ emission. Combinations such as coal cleaning and limestone injection multistage burners (LIMB) or flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) may be more cost effective than FGD alone. The use of a multi-stream coal-preparation plant to produce deep-cleaned and middling products is another control option. The deep-cleaned coal, which is low in ash and sulfur, can be burned without further SO/sub 2/ emission control while the middling product can be burned in a boiler with a LIMB or FGD system.

Key concepts: Flue-gas desulfurization, Coal, Waste management, Pyrite, Sulfur, Flue gas, Clean coal technology, Clean coal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coal-cleaning options for SO/sub 2/ emission reduction — Research Paper | ScholarLens