Effect of Fenoxaprop and Sulfosulfuron Alone and as Tank Mixture Against Complex Flora of Weeds in Wheat
R. S. Banga, Ashok Yadav
Abstract
R. S. Banga, Ashok Yadav
Abstract
Post-emergence application of fenoxaprop at 120 g ha−1 was very effective against Avena ludoviciana and was ineffective against Rumex retroflex and Coronopus didymus in wheat. Sulfosulfuron at 20 g ha−1 being superior to its lower doses was effective (WCE 8.2%) agalnst these weeds. In general, tank mlx application of fenoxaprop and sulfosulfuron at 116.7+23.3 g ha−1 was more effective than when used as 127.3+12.7 g.ha−1. Tank mix application of fenoxaprop with 2, 4-D Na at 120+500 g ha−1 had poor WcE (32%).
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Post-emergence application of fenoxaprop at 120 g ha−1 was very effective against Avena ludoviciana and was ineffective against Rumex retroflex and Coronopus didymus in wheat. Sulfosulfuron at 20 g ha−1 being superior to its lower doses was effective (WCE 8.2%) agalnst these weeds. In general, tank mlx application of fenoxaprop and sulfosulfuron at 116.7+23.3 g ha−1 was more effective than when used as 127.3+12.7 g.ha−1. Tank mix application of fenoxaprop with 2, 4-D Na at 120+500 g ha−1 had poor WcE (32%).
Key concepts: Rumex, Avena, Agronomy, Flora (microbiology), Veterinary medicine, Biology, Toxicology, Medicine