Prosecution Appeals in New South Wales: New Rights, Roles and Challenges for the Court of Criminal Appeal and the DPP
Nicholas Cowdery
Abstract
Nicholas Cowdery
Abstract
Although major reforms to the appeal rights of accused persons were introduced in the early part of the 20th century in England and Australia, no equivalent appeal rights were introduced for the prosecution. In 2008 the situation has substantially changed with the prosecution now having a right to appeal against alleged lenient sentences in all jurisdictions in Australia. However, in New South Wales, recent legislative reforms have introduced even more radical and controversial appeal rights for the prosecution in the higher courts. These include a right to appeal interlocutory orders where the order substantially weakens the prosecution case, and a right to seek a retrial of a person who was acquitted. These reforms involve a reconceptualisation of the notion of a 'miscarriage of justice' and a redefining of the traditional relationship between the accused, the prosecution, and the State. In the context of criminal appeals, the public interest, and the interests of crime victims, have been accorded greater weight.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Although major reforms to the appeal rights of accused persons were introduced in the early part of the 20th century in England and Australia, no equivalent appeal rights were introduced for the prosecution. In 2008 the situation has substantially changed with the prosecution now having a right to appeal against alleged lenient sentences in all jurisdictions in Australia. However, in New South Wales, recent legislative reforms have introduced even more radical and controversial appeal rights for the prosecution in the higher courts. These include a right to appeal interlocutory orders where the order substantially weakens the prosecution case, and a right to seek a retrial of a person who was acquitted. These reforms involve a reconceptualisation of the notion of a 'miscarriage of justice' and a redefining of the traditional relationship between the accused, the prosecution, and the State. In the context of criminal appeals, the public interest, and the interests of crime victims, have been accorded greater weight.
Key concepts: Appeal, Law, Interlocutory, Political science, Context (archaeology), Legislature, Criminal justice, High Court