2000Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Requires access

Capital especulativo parasitario versus capital financiero

Reinaldo A. Carcanholo, Paulo Nakatani

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The imprecise idea of financial widely used in recent analyses of the globalization of capital, led the authors to create a theoretical  definition of speculative capital, starting from a strictly Marxist point of  view. To this end, the analysis begins by defining the concepts of  capital, industrial capital and its functional forms, interest capital and  fictional capital. This led the authors to conclude that, within the  specific conditions of contemporary capitalism, the concept of industrial capital has been dialectically transformed into that of speculative capital, which, in turn, co-exists with its opposite, parasitic speculative capital. This conversion is the result of the dramatic expansion of fictitious capital, observed in recent decades, which has made it  dominate the latter. Thus, fictitious capital becomes parasitic,  speculative capital. Its hegemony determines the contradictions that  explain the current crises of capitalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The imprecise idea of financial widely used in recent analyses of the globalization of capital, led the authors to create a theoretical  definition of speculative capital, starting from a strictly Marxist point of  view. To this end, the analysis begins by defining the concepts of  capital, industrial capital and its functional forms, interest capital and  fictional capital. This led the authors to conclude that, within the  specific conditions of contemporary capitalism, the concept of industrial capital has been dialectically transformed into that of speculative capital, which, in turn, co-exists with its opposite, parasitic speculative capital. This conversion is the result of the dramatic expansion of fictitious capital, observed in recent decades, which has made it  dominate the latter. Thus, fictitious capital becomes parasitic,  speculative capital. Its hegemony determines the contradictions that  explain the current crises of capitalism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The imprecise idea of financial widely used in recent analyses of the globalization of capital, led the authors to create a theoretical  definition of speculative capital, starting from a strictly Marxist point of  view. To this end, the analysis begins by defining the concepts of  capital, industrial capital and its functional forms, interest capital and  fictional capital. This led the authors to conclude that, within the  specific conditions of contemporary capitalism, the concept of industrial capital has been dialectically transformed into that of speculative capital, which, in turn, co-exists with its opposite, parasitic speculative capital. This conversion is the result of the dramatic expansion of fictitious capital, observed in recent decades, which has made it  dominate the latter. Thus, fictitious capital becomes parasitic,  speculative capital. Its hegemony determines the contradictions that  explain the current crises of capitalism.

Key concepts: Capital (architecture), Financial capital, Capitalism, Economic capital, Fixed capital, Economics, Capital deepening, Individual capital

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Capital especulativo parasitario versus capital financiero — Research Paper | ScholarLens