1939SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesRequires access

Prospects for Use of “Safety Fuels” in Spark-Ignition Aircraft Engines

Frank C. Mock

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

RECENT developments in fuel-refining processes have developed new safety fuels, and have revived general interest in the subject, Mr. Mock reports. “Safety” or fireproof aircraft fuels, he explains, must be less volatile than gasoline and should have a flash point of about 105 F, a distillation range between 375 and 475 F, and about 87 octane rating. In his paper he summarizes the program probably necessary before such fuels can be employed successfully in every-day service operations. Three methods of fuel feed are discussed: injection into the cylinder, into the intake pipes, and into the supercharger. Injection into the cylinder, he reports, has been tested on a full-scale engine on the dynamometer with some success, but it was not flown. Injection into the supercharger, he feels, is attractive because of its simplicity. Five detail problems are listed: injection equipment; changes in engine and cylinder; fuel-air metering and power control; starting; and installation. Of these, Mr. Mock remarks that the injection equipment and fuel-air metering and power control are well developed; changes in engine and cylinder have been started; and starting remains to be solved. He concludes that safety fuel can be used but not without considerable research taking three or four years, which will eventuate in certain changes in engine design.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

RECENT developments in fuel-refining processes have developed new safety fuels, and have revived general interest in the subject, Mr. Mock reports. “Safety” or fireproof aircraft fuels, he explains, must be less volatile than gasoline and should have a flash point of about 105 F, a distillation range between 375 and 475 F, and about 87 octane rating. In his paper he summarizes the program probably necessary before such fuels can be employed successfully in every-day service operations. Three methods of fuel feed are discussed: injection into the cylinder, into the intake pipes, and into the supercharger. Injection into the cylinder, he reports, has been tested on a full-scale engine on the dynamometer with some success, but it was not flown. Injection into the supercharger, he feels, is attractive because of its simplicity. Five detail problems are listed: injection equipment; changes in engine and cylinder; fuel-air metering and power control; starting; and installation. Of these, Mr. Mock remarks that the injection equipment and fuel-air metering and power control are well developed; changes in engine and cylinder have been started; and starting remains to be solved. He concludes that safety fuel can be used but not without considerable research taking three or four years, which will eventuate in certain changes in engine design.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

RECENT developments in fuel-refining processes have developed new safety fuels, and have revived general interest in the subject, Mr. Mock reports. “Safety” or fireproof aircraft fuels, he explains, must be less volatile than gasoline and should have a flash point of about 105 F, a distillation range between 375 and 475 F, and about 87 octane rating. In his paper he summarizes the program probably necessary before such fuels can be employed successfully in every-day service operations. Three methods of fuel feed are discussed: injection into the cylinder, into the intake pipes, and into the supercharger. Injection into the cylinder, he reports, has been tested on a full-scale engine on the dynamometer with some success, but it was not flown. Injection into the supercharger, he feels, is attractive because of its simplicity. Five detail problems are listed: injection equipment; changes in engine and cylinder; fuel-air metering and power control; starting; and installation. Of these, Mr. Mock remarks that the injection equipment and fuel-air metering and power control are well developed; changes in engine and cylinder have been started; and starting remains to be solved. He concludes that safety fuel can be used but not without considerable research taking three or four years, which will eventuate in certain changes in engine design.

Key concepts: Ignition system, SPARK (programming language), Automotive engineering, Nuclear engineering, Aerospace engineering, Environmental science, Aeronautics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prospects for Use of “Safety Fuels” in Spark-Ignition Aircraft Engines — Research Paper | ScholarLens