1976Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

STRUCTURAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS: AN INTERCITY APPLICATION

John B Peers, M P Bevilacqua

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Conventional sequential transportation models clearly have limitations as estimators of intercity travel demand. Despite their theoretical advantage, little work has been carried out in the full application of behavioral or models. Structural-model development is focused primarily on disaggregate models, particularly for modal split. This paper discussess the development of an alternative approach, that of developing a set of direct-demand models for estimating intercity transit travel for a Sacramento-Stockton-San Francisco Bay Area corridor study. A series of judgments are desired that identify why structural models rather than sequential models were chosen and why direct-demand models rather than probabalistic-choice models were used. The methodology of calibration, including variable selection and equation development, validation, and forecasting, is outlined. Emphasis is placed on the trade-offs to be made among policy responsiveness, accuracy, and the practical problems of developing and using such forecasting tools. The material has been oriented toward the planner-engineer faced with the practical issues of selecting and using intercity travel demand forecasting procedures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conventional sequential transportation models clearly have limitations as estimators of intercity travel demand. Despite their theoretical advantage, little work has been carried out in the full application of behavioral or models. Structural-model development is focused primarily on disaggregate models, particularly for modal split. This paper discussess the development of an alternative approach, that of developing a set of direct-demand models for estimating intercity transit travel for a Sacramento-Stockton-San Francisco Bay Area corridor study. A series of judgments are desired that identify why structural models rather than sequential models were chosen and why direct-demand models rather than probabalistic-choice models were used. The methodology of calibration, including variable selection and equation development, validation, and forecasting, is outlined. Emphasis is placed on the trade-offs to be made among policy responsiveness, accuracy, and the practical problems of developing and using such forecasting tools. The material has been oriented toward the planner-engineer faced with the practical issues of selecting and using intercity travel demand forecasting procedures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conventional sequential transportation models clearly have limitations as estimators of intercity travel demand. Despite their theoretical advantage, little work has been carried out in the full application of behavioral or models. Structural-model development is focused primarily on disaggregate models, particularly for modal split. This paper discussess the development of an alternative approach, that of developing a set of direct-demand models for estimating intercity transit travel for a Sacramento-Stockton-San Francisco Bay Area corridor study. A series of judgments are desired that identify why structural models rather than sequential models were chosen and why direct-demand models rather than probabalistic-choice models were used. The methodology of calibration, including variable selection and equation development, validation, and forecasting, is outlined. Emphasis is placed on the trade-offs to be made among policy responsiveness, accuracy, and the practical problems of developing and using such forecasting tools. The material has been oriented toward the planner-engineer faced with the practical issues of selecting and using intercity travel demand forecasting procedures.

Key concepts: Demand forecasting, Transport engineering, Travel behavior, Operations research, Modal, Model selection, Computer science, Trip distribution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
STRUCTURAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS: AN INTERCITY APPLICATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens