2013•Unimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak)Requires access

Engineering behavior of soil treated by chemical and electrokinetics

Shyue Leong Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Soft soil has the characteristics of high compressibility, low shear strength and low permeability. \nResearch on soft soil stabilization was conducted to determine the strength development of treated soil. Chemical stabilization with lime and electrokinetic stabilization were used. Different lime contents were added to the soil for lime stabilization and electrokinetics-lime stabilization and the samples were tested after the curing period by using vane shear test equipment. Comparison of strength gained for both lime stabilization and electrokinetics-lime stabilization \nwas conducted including the determination of optimum lime content required. The reason behind the strength gained for the treated soil is due to the pozzonalic reaction to produce calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) and calcium aluminium hydrate (CAH), which bind with the soil particles and increase the strength of the soil. The difference between lime stabilization and \nelectrokinetics-lime stabilization is direct current is applied on the electrokinetics-lime stabilization for 1 hr at the voltage gradient of 34.96 V/m. The strength of lime stabilized soil increased by 16.43% for 7.5% to 12.5 % lime content. However, the strength of the elctrokinetics-lime stabilized soil decreased for 25.61% with increase in lime content from 7.5% to 12.5%. Hence, it can be concluded that lime stabilization is more effective than electrokineticslime stabilization in this research.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Soft soil has the characteristics of high compressibility, low shear strength and low permeability. \nResearch on soft soil stabilization was conducted to determine the strength development of treated soil. Chemical stabilization with lime and electrokinetic stabilization were used. Different lime contents were added to the soil for lime stabilization and electrokinetics-lime stabilization and the samples were tested after the curing period by using vane shear test equipment. Comparison of strength gained for both lime stabilization and electrokinetics-lime stabilization \nwas conducted including the determination of optimum lime content required. The reason behind the strength gained for the treated soil is due to the pozzonalic reaction to produce calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) and calcium aluminium hydrate (CAH), which bind with the soil particles and increase the strength of the soil. The difference between lime stabilization and \nelectrokinetics-lime stabilization is direct current is applied on the electrokinetics-lime stabilization for 1 hr at the voltage gradient of 34.96 V/m. The strength of lime stabilized soil increased by 16.43% for 7.5% to 12.5 % lime content. However, the strength of the elctrokinetics-lime stabilized soil decreased for 25.61% with increase in lime content from 7.5% to 12.5%. Hence, it can be concluded that lime stabilization is more effective than electrokineticslime stabilization in this research.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Soft soil has the characteristics of high compressibility, low shear strength and low permeability. \nResearch on soft soil stabilization was conducted to determine the strength development of treated soil. Chemical stabilization with lime and electrokinetic stabilization were used. Different lime contents were added to the soil for lime stabilization and electrokinetics-lime stabilization and the samples were tested after the curing period by using vane shear test equipment. Comparison of strength gained for both lime stabilization and electrokinetics-lime stabilization \nwas conducted including the determination of optimum lime content required. The reason behind the strength gained for the treated soil is due to the pozzonalic reaction to produce calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) and calcium aluminium hydrate (CAH), which bind with the soil particles and increase the strength of the soil. The difference between lime stabilization and \nelectrokinetics-lime stabilization is direct current is applied on the electrokinetics-lime stabilization for 1 hr at the voltage gradient of 34.96 V/m. The strength of lime stabilized soil increased by 16.43% for 7.5% to 12.5 % lime content. However, the strength of the elctrokinetics-lime stabilized soil decreased for 25.61% with increase in lime content from 7.5% to 12.5%. Hence, it can be concluded that lime stabilization is more effective than electrokineticslime stabilization in this research.

Key concepts: Lime, Soil stabilization, Electrokinetic phenomena, Soil pH, Geotechnical engineering, Calcium silicate hydrate, Chemistry, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Engineering behavior of soil treated by chemical and electrokinetics — Research Paper | ScholarLens