Commonwealth Power and the Fiscal Stimulus
David Michael Thomas
Abstract
David Michael Thomas
Abstract
The case of Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 257 ALR 1, 83 ALJR 765 is discussed to better understand the impact of the tax stimulus being provided by the Australian Federal government to every Australian citizen keeping in mind the global financial meltdown. The most notable aspect of the decision in Pape is the clear divergence in approach between a majority prepared to accept the submissions of the Commonwealth.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The case of Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 257 ALR 1, 83 ALJR 765 is discussed to better understand the impact of the tax stimulus being provided by the Australian Federal government to every Australian citizen keeping in mind the global financial meltdown. The most notable aspect of the decision in Pape is the clear divergence in approach between a majority prepared to accept the submissions of the Commonwealth.
Key concepts: Commonwealth, Stimulus (psychology), Economics, Political science, Law, Psychology, Cognitive psychology