1987Bulletin of the Atomic ScientistsRequires access

U.S. nuclear strategy: theory vs. practice

David Alan Rosenberg

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Theorists and consultants have had little impact on the development of nuclear weapons policies. Rather, strategic planning should be seen as a governmental process, carried out largely by military officers and civilian bureaucrats.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Theorists and consultants have had little impact on the development of nuclear weapons policies. Rather, strategic planning should be seen as a governmental process, carried out largely by military officers and civilian bureaucrats.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Theorists and consultants have had little impact on the development of nuclear weapons policies. Rather, strategic planning should be seen as a governmental process, carried out largely by military officers and civilian bureaucrats.

Key concepts: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear strategy, Process (computing), Political science, Strategic planning, Public administration, Business, Management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
U.S. nuclear strategy: theory vs. practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens