1976Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

WHAT PRIZES WHEN ONE SUBSIDIZES? SOME LESSONS FROM THE PAST

James R. Nelson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper reviews past U.S. subsidy programs in both agriculture and transportation to establish facts about federal subsidies and apply these facts to current federal transportation subsidy programs. Two points are made. First, traditional transportation subsidies paid by the federal government have been justified in terms of national advantage. Based on this assumption, the case for federal subsidization of urban public transportation would be in extreme difficulty. This point primarily estabilishes reasons why urban transportation subsidies should not exist. There is, however, another approach, which leads to the second point that a new case for federal subsidization can be made strictly in terms of local advantage. An argument is presented for this new case.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper reviews past U.S. subsidy programs in both agriculture and transportation to establish facts about federal subsidies and apply these facts to current federal transportation subsidy programs. Two points are made. First, traditional transportation subsidies paid by the federal government have been justified in terms of national advantage. Based on this assumption, the case for federal subsidization of urban public transportation would be in extreme difficulty. This point primarily estabilishes reasons why urban transportation subsidies should not exist. There is, however, another approach, which leads to the second point that a new case for federal subsidization can be made strictly in terms of local advantage. An argument is presented for this new case.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper reviews past U.S. subsidy programs in both agriculture and transportation to establish facts about federal subsidies and apply these facts to current federal transportation subsidy programs. Two points are made. First, traditional transportation subsidies paid by the federal government have been justified in terms of national advantage. Based on this assumption, the case for federal subsidization of urban public transportation would be in extreme difficulty. This point primarily estabilishes reasons why urban transportation subsidies should not exist. There is, however, another approach, which leads to the second point that a new case for federal subsidization can be made strictly in terms of local advantage. An argument is presented for this new case.

Key concepts: Subsidy, Point (geometry), Government (linguistics), Public transport, Argument (complex analysis), Public economics, Economics, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WHAT PRIZES WHEN ONE SUBSIDIZES? SOME LESSONS FROM THE PAST — Research Paper | ScholarLens