1962•Highway Research RecordRequires access

TOTAL ANNUAL COST ANALYSIS

J A Head, R C Blensly

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

FOR MANY YEARS, OREGON HAS USED THE BENEFIT QUOTIENT AS A TOOL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN SELECTING THE BEST OF ALTERNATE ROUTE LOCATIONS. THIS TOOL, HOWEVER, HAS SOME DISADVANTAGES WHICH PROHIBIT ITS USE IN ALL AREAS WHERE AN ECONOMIC TOOL IS DESIRABLE. OVER THE COURSE OF YEARS, CONSIDERABLE THOUGHT HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PROBLEM, A REVIEW OF ALL METHODS PROPOSED INDICATES THAT THE CONCEPT OF MINIMUM ANNUAL COST WOULD HAVE THE MOST UNIVERSAL APPLICATION TO SATISFY THE NEEDS OF THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. THE USE OF A MINIMUM ANNUAL COST FOR ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DOES NOT LIMIT ITSELF TO THE NORMAL ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATE ROUTE LOCATIONS. THIS PAPER DISCUSSES ITS APPLICATION TO INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION AS IT RELATES TO LOCATION AND ALTERNATE DESIGN. /AUTHOR/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

FOR MANY YEARS, OREGON HAS USED THE BENEFIT QUOTIENT AS A TOOL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN SELECTING THE BEST OF ALTERNATE ROUTE LOCATIONS. THIS TOOL, HOWEVER, HAS SOME DISADVANTAGES WHICH PROHIBIT ITS USE IN ALL AREAS WHERE AN ECONOMIC TOOL IS DESIRABLE. OVER THE COURSE OF YEARS, CONSIDERABLE THOUGHT HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PROBLEM, A REVIEW OF ALL METHODS PROPOSED INDICATES THAT THE CONCEPT OF MINIMUM ANNUAL COST WOULD HAVE THE MOST UNIVERSAL APPLICATION TO SATISFY THE NEEDS OF THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. THE USE OF A MINIMUM ANNUAL COST FOR ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DOES NOT LIMIT ITSELF TO THE NORMAL ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATE ROUTE LOCATIONS. THIS PAPER DISCUSSES ITS APPLICATION TO INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION AS IT RELATES TO LOCATION AND ALTERNATE DESIGN. /AUTHOR/

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

FOR MANY YEARS, OREGON HAS USED THE BENEFIT QUOTIENT AS A TOOL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN SELECTING THE BEST OF ALTERNATE ROUTE LOCATIONS. THIS TOOL, HOWEVER, HAS SOME DISADVANTAGES WHICH PROHIBIT ITS USE IN ALL AREAS WHERE AN ECONOMIC TOOL IS DESIRABLE. OVER THE COURSE OF YEARS, CONSIDERABLE THOUGHT HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PROBLEM, A REVIEW OF ALL METHODS PROPOSED INDICATES THAT THE CONCEPT OF MINIMUM ANNUAL COST WOULD HAVE THE MOST UNIVERSAL APPLICATION TO SATISFY THE NEEDS OF THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. THE USE OF A MINIMUM ANNUAL COST FOR ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DOES NOT LIMIT ITSELF TO THE NORMAL ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATE ROUTE LOCATIONS. THIS PAPER DISCUSSES ITS APPLICATION TO INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION AS IT RELATES TO LOCATION AND ALTERNATE DESIGN. /AUTHOR/

Key concepts: Economic analysis, Cost analysis, Transport engineering, Operations research, Cost–benefit analysis, Computer science, Risk analysis (engineering), Quotient

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TOTAL ANNUAL COST ANALYSIS — Research Paper | ScholarLens