2015Anaesthesia and Intensive CareOpen access

The Relationship between Superior Vena Cava Diameter and Collapsibility and Central Venous Pressure

Brian Cowie, Roman Kluger, Steffen Rex, Carlo Missant

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between superior vena cava (SVC) diameter, collapsibility and central venous pressure (CVP) in cardiac surgical patients. SVC maximum and minimum diameters, plus collapsibility with ventilation, were measured with transoesophageal echocardiography in the mid-oesophageal bicaval view with M-mode. Simultaneously, CVP was measured via the right atrial port of a pulmonary artery catheter. Measurements were possible in 91 out of 92 patients. The median CVP was 10 mmHg with a range of 2 to 19 mmHg. There was a weak, but statistically significant, correlation between CVP and SVC collapsibility index (r=-0.21, P=0.049). There was no statistically significant correlation between maximum SVC diameter and CVP. Maximum SVC diameter was statistically significantly correlated with weight (Pearson's r=0.28, P=0.008). There was no statistically significant correlation between CVP and age or body dimensions. Our findings indicate that SVC diameter and collapsibility are easily measured with transoesophageal echocardiography but do not reliably reflect CVP in anaesthetised cardiac surgical patients.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between superior vena cava (SVC) diameter, collapsibility and central venous pressure (CVP) in cardiac surgical patients. SVC maximum and minimum diameters, plus collapsibility with ventilation, were measured with transoesophageal echocardiography in the mid-oesophageal bicaval view with M-mode. Simultaneously, CVP was measured via the right atrial port of a pulmonary artery catheter. Measurements were possible in 91 out of 92 patients. The median CVP was 10 mmHg with a range of 2 to 19 mmHg. There was a weak, but statistically significant, correlation between CVP and SVC collapsibility index (r=-0.21, P=0.049). There was no statistically significant correlation between maximum SVC diameter and CVP. Maximum SVC diameter was statistically significantly correlated with weight (Pearson's r=0.28, P=0.008). There was no statistically significant correlation between CVP and age or body dimensions. Our findings indicate that SVC diameter and collapsibility are easily measured with transoesophageal echocardiography but do not reliably reflect CVP in anaesthetised cardiac surgical patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between superior vena cava (SVC) diameter, collapsibility and central venous pressure (CVP) in cardiac surgical patients. SVC maximum and minimum diameters, plus collapsibility with ventilation, were measured with transoesophageal echocardiography in the mid-oesophageal bicaval view with M-mode. Simultaneously, CVP was measured via the right atrial port of a pulmonary artery catheter. Measurements were possible in 91 out of 92 patients. The median CVP was 10 mmHg with a range of 2 to 19 mmHg. There was a weak, but statistically significant, correlation between CVP and SVC collapsibility index (r=-0.21, P=0.049). There was no statistically significant correlation between maximum SVC diameter and CVP. Maximum SVC diameter was statistically significantly correlated with weight (Pearson's r=0.28, P=0.008). There was no statistically significant correlation between CVP and age or body dimensions. Our findings indicate that SVC diameter and collapsibility are easily measured with transoesophageal echocardiography but do not reliably reflect CVP in anaesthetised cardiac surgical patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Central venous pressure, Superior vena cava, Central venous catheter, Cardiology, Mechanical ventilation, Pulmonary artery, Inferior vena cava

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Relationship between Superior Vena Cava Diameter and Collapsibility and Central Venous Pressure — Research Paper | ScholarLens