2015DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Requires access

The Comparison of Different Fertilizer Technologies on Nitrogen Leaching Losses and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rice Production——Taking Ningxia Irrigation Region as an Example

Aiping Zhang, Ji Gao, Ruliang Liu, CHEN Zhe, Shiqi Yang, Zhengli Yang, Qingwen Zhang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

High N fertilizer and flooding irrigation applied to rice in anthropogenic-alluvial soil often result in N leaching and low use efficiency of applied fertilizer N from the rice field in Ningxia irrigation region in the upper reaches of the Yellow River. Sound N management practices need to be established to improve N use efficiency while sustain high grain yield levels and minimize fertilizer N loss to the environment. We investigated the effects of different fertilizer technologies on N leaching, N use efficiency and rice yield. The four fertilizer N treatments were CK (No nitrogen fertilizer application treatment); FP (Farmer's practice of application rate of urea at 300 kg N·hm-2, 60% used as base fertilizer, 20% as tillering fertilizer and 20% as booting fertilizer); SD (Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N·hm-2, all controlled-release fertilizer was applied as base fertilizer while transplant rice seedlings) and NB (Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N·hm-2, all controlled-release fertilizer was applied as base fertilizer in the seeding soil). The results showed that the SD and NB treatments could reduce the amount of nitrogen applied by 60% compared to FP but still maintain crop yields while substantially reducing N losses to the environment. The SD could significantly decrease the N leaching losses from the paddy field. Under the FP treatment, the leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N were 39.89, 26.22 kg·hm-2 and 5.49 kg·hm-2, respectively. Compared with FP treatment, the SD treatment could decrease the leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 18.97, 11.18 kg·hm-2 and 2.27 kg·hm-2. The nitrogen use efficiency of SD treatment was 55.7% which increased by 21.4% compared with FP treatment. NB treatment also could decrease nitrogen leaching losses TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 14.36, 10.14 kg·hm-2 and 1.84 kg·hm-2 and increase the N use efficiency by 15.7% compared with FP, but it increased nitrogen leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 4.61, 1.04 kg·hm-2 and 0.43 kg·hm-2 and decreased nitrogen use efficiency by 5.7% compared with SD. Considering the importance of sustaining high food production and minimizing negative environmental threat, we recommend the SD as an alternative management strategy for mitigating N loss in irrigated rice system in Ningxia irrigation region.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

High N fertilizer and flooding irrigation applied to rice in anthropogenic-alluvial soil often result in N leaching and low use efficiency of applied fertilizer N from the rice field in Ningxia irrigation region in the upper reaches of the Yellow River. Sound N management practices need to be established to improve N use efficiency while sustain high grain yield levels and minimize fertilizer N loss to the environment. We investigated the effects of different fertilizer technologies on N leaching, N use efficiency and rice yield. The four fertilizer N treatments were CK (No nitrogen fertilizer application treatment); FP (Farmer's practice of application rate of urea at 300 kg N·hm-2, 60% used as base fertilizer, 20% as tillering fertilizer and 20% as booting fertilizer); SD (Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N·hm-2, all controlled-release fertilizer was applied as base fertilizer while transplant rice seedlings) and NB (Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N·hm-2, all controlled-release fertilizer was applied as base fertilizer in the seeding soil). The results showed that the SD and NB treatments could reduce the amount of nitrogen applied by 60% compared to FP but still maintain crop yields while substantially reducing N losses to the environment. The SD could significantly decrease the N leaching losses from the paddy field. Under the FP treatment, the leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N were 39.89, 26.22 kg·hm-2 and 5.49 kg·hm-2, respectively. Compared with FP treatment, the SD treatment could decrease the leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 18.97, 11.18 kg·hm-2 and 2.27 kg·hm-2. The nitrogen use efficiency of SD treatment was 55.7% which increased by 21.4% compared with FP treatment. NB treatment also could decrease nitrogen leaching losses TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 14.36, 10.14 kg·hm-2 and 1.84 kg·hm-2 and increase the N use efficiency by 15.7% compared with FP, but it increased nitrogen leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 4.61, 1.04 kg·hm-2 and 0.43 kg·hm-2 and decreased nitrogen use efficiency by 5.7% compared with SD. Considering the importance of sustaining high food production and minimizing negative environmental threat, we recommend the SD as an alternative management strategy for mitigating N loss in irrigated rice system in Ningxia irrigation region.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

High N fertilizer and flooding irrigation applied to rice in anthropogenic-alluvial soil often result in N leaching and low use efficiency of applied fertilizer N from the rice field in Ningxia irrigation region in the upper reaches of the Yellow River. Sound N management practices need to be established to improve N use efficiency while sustain high grain yield levels and minimize fertilizer N loss to the environment. We investigated the effects of different fertilizer technologies on N leaching, N use efficiency and rice yield. The four fertilizer N treatments were CK (No nitrogen fertilizer application treatment); FP (Farmer's practice of application rate of urea at 300 kg N·hm-2, 60% used as base fertilizer, 20% as tillering fertilizer and 20% as booting fertilizer); SD (Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N·hm-2, all controlled-release fertilizer was applied as base fertilizer while transplant rice seedlings) and NB (Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer at 120 kg N·hm-2, all controlled-release fertilizer was applied as base fertilizer in the seeding soil). The results showed that the SD and NB treatments could reduce the amount of nitrogen applied by 60% compared to FP but still maintain crop yields while substantially reducing N losses to the environment. The SD could significantly decrease the N leaching losses from the paddy field. Under the FP treatment, the leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N were 39.89, 26.22 kg·hm-2 and 5.49 kg·hm-2, respectively. Compared with FP treatment, the SD treatment could decrease the leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 18.97, 11.18 kg·hm-2 and 2.27 kg·hm-2. The nitrogen use efficiency of SD treatment was 55.7% which increased by 21.4% compared with FP treatment. NB treatment also could decrease nitrogen leaching losses TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 14.36, 10.14 kg·hm-2 and 1.84 kg·hm-2 and increase the N use efficiency by 15.7% compared with FP, but it increased nitrogen leaching losses of TN, NO3-N and NH4+-N by 4.61, 1.04 kg·hm-2 and 0.43 kg·hm-2 and decreased nitrogen use efficiency by 5.7% compared with SD. Considering the importance of sustaining high food production and minimizing negative environmental threat, we recommend the SD as an alternative management strategy for mitigating N loss in irrigated rice system in Ningxia irrigation region.

Key concepts: Leaching (pedology), Irrigation, Nitrogen, Fertilizer, Environmental science, Production (economics), Nitrogen fertilizer, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Comparison of Different Fertilizer Technologies on Nitrogen Leaching Losses and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rice Production——Taking Ningxia Irrigation Region as an Example — Research Paper | ScholarLens