LEGISLATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE STATE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND TRANSIT PLANNING IN CALIFORNIA
Robert A Burco
Abstract
Robert A Burco
Abstract
The state of California has created a multimodal Department of Transportation and has embarked on a major statewide transportation planning effort. Although the legislation gives much of the responsibility for planning to regional agencies in the major metropolitan area, both the California Department of Transportation and the California legislature have important roles in the first iteration of a plan to be developed by 1976. This paper points out several concerns that the legislature may pursue in reviewing and guiding the planning process. These concerns deal with the issues of goal setting, decision making, and conflict resolution rather than with the technical details of planning. Four concerns about multimodal planning are examined in this paper: (a) planning for operations versus planning for facilities; (b) corridor versus local travel needs; (c) planning bases in technical expertise and analytical technique versus public openness and broad participation; and (d) programming versus master planning. Because transit planning has been largely absent from past state-level transportation concerns, several conceptual transit planning issues are raised in this paper as well. Examples from the recent Los Angeles planning experience illustrate legislative interest in staged decision-making and multimode transit solutions.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The state of California has created a multimodal Department of Transportation and has embarked on a major statewide transportation planning effort. Although the legislation gives much of the responsibility for planning to regional agencies in the major metropolitan area, both the California Department of Transportation and the California legislature have important roles in the first iteration of a plan to be developed by 1976. This paper points out several concerns that the legislature may pursue in reviewing and guiding the planning process. These concerns deal with the issues of goal setting, decision making, and conflict resolution rather than with the technical details of planning. Four concerns about multimodal planning are examined in this paper: (a) planning for operations versus planning for facilities; (b) corridor versus local travel needs; (c) planning bases in technical expertise and analytical technique versus public openness and broad participation; and (d) programming versus master planning. Because transit planning has been largely absent from past state-level transportation concerns, several conceptual transit planning issues are raised in this paper as well. Examples from the recent Los Angeles planning experience illustrate legislative interest in staged decision-making and multimode transit solutions.
Key concepts: Transportation planning, Legislature, Environmental design and planning, Regional planning, Site plan, Legislation, Metropolitan area, Comprehensive planning