1998PubMedRequires access

[Ultrastructure of the tectorial membrane in chick inner ear].

Yu Zhang, J Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In order to understand the ultrastructure of the tectorial membrane(TM) in avian inner ear and the relations between TM and hair cells and supporting cells, scanning electron microscope(SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) were used to observe the ultrastructure of TM in chick inner ear. The results were that: when viewed under SEM, TM, which possessed a lot of holes inside, was triangular in shape in cross-section and the surface of TM presented fibrous net; when viewed under TEM, TM consisted of fine fibrils and gelatinous substance, only the tallest row of stereocilia and the kinocilium in each hair cell were inserted to TM. The microvilli of supporting cells were anchored to TM by cotton-like fibrous webs. This junction had both elastic and firm, to a certain extent, this kind of junction restricted the movement of TM. According to these structures, there should be different patterns of response to sound stimuli between avian cochlea and mammalian cochlea.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to understand the ultrastructure of the tectorial membrane(TM) in avian inner ear and the relations between TM and hair cells and supporting cells, scanning electron microscope(SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) were used to observe the ultrastructure of TM in chick inner ear. The results were that: when viewed under SEM, TM, which possessed a lot of holes inside, was triangular in shape in cross-section and the surface of TM presented fibrous net; when viewed under TEM, TM consisted of fine fibrils and gelatinous substance, only the tallest row of stereocilia and the kinocilium in each hair cell were inserted to TM. The microvilli of supporting cells were anchored to TM by cotton-like fibrous webs. This junction had both elastic and firm, to a certain extent, this kind of junction restricted the movement of TM. According to these structures, there should be different patterns of response to sound stimuli between avian cochlea and mammalian cochlea.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to understand the ultrastructure of the tectorial membrane(TM) in avian inner ear and the relations between TM and hair cells and supporting cells, scanning electron microscope(SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) were used to observe the ultrastructure of TM in chick inner ear. The results were that: when viewed under SEM, TM, which possessed a lot of holes inside, was triangular in shape in cross-section and the surface of TM presented fibrous net; when viewed under TEM, TM consisted of fine fibrils and gelatinous substance, only the tallest row of stereocilia and the kinocilium in each hair cell were inserted to TM. The microvilli of supporting cells were anchored to TM by cotton-like fibrous webs. This junction had both elastic and firm, to a certain extent, this kind of junction restricted the movement of TM. According to these structures, there should be different patterns of response to sound stimuli between avian cochlea and mammalian cochlea.

Key concepts: Tectorial membrane, Kinocilium, Ultrastructure, Stereocilia (inner ear), Cochlea, Inner ear, Anatomy, Electron microscope

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Ultrastructure of the tectorial membrane in chick inner ear]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens