'Director's Duty to Promote the Success of the Company': Should Hong Kong Implement a Similar Provision?
Kong Shan John Ho
Abstract
Kong Shan John Ho
Abstract
Section 172 of the UK Companies Act 2006 is arguably one of the most controversial provisions introduced into the company law of the UK by incorporating the concept of enlightened shareholder value, together with a list of non-exhaustive factors that directors ought to take into account in promoting the success of the company. The discussion focuses on a recent review undertaken by the Hong Kong Standing Committee on Company Law Reform (SCCLR) as to whether Hong Kong should follow the UK by incorporating a similar provision to section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 in its Companies Bill. Contrary to the SCCLR recommendation, the primary conclusion drawn is that it makes commercial sense for a similar provision to be introduced in Hong Kong. A careful examination of section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 simply reflects existing law and modern business practices. Therefore, the purpose of implementing such duty on directors does no more than reinstate the practical reality.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Section 172 of the UK Companies Act 2006 is arguably one of the most controversial provisions introduced into the company law of the UK by incorporating the concept of enlightened shareholder value, together with a list of non-exhaustive factors that directors ought to take into account in promoting the success of the company. The discussion focuses on a recent review undertaken by the Hong Kong Standing Committee on Company Law Reform (SCCLR) as to whether Hong Kong should follow the UK by incorporating a similar provision to section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 in its Companies Bill. Contrary to the SCCLR recommendation, the primary conclusion drawn is that it makes commercial sense for a similar provision to be introduced in Hong Kong. A careful examination of section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 simply reflects existing law and modern business practices. Therefore, the purpose of implementing such duty on directors does no more than reinstate the practical reality.
Key concepts: Companies Act, Duty, Corporate law, Shareholder, Business, Section (typography), Accounting, Limited company